|
|
||||||||
1 U.S. Geological Survey
345
Middlefield Rd.
Menlo Park, California
94025
mfisher{at}usgs.gov
(M.A.F.,
W.J.N., J.M.G.G.)
2 Geophysical Institute
University
of Alaska
P.O. Box 757320
Fairbanks, Alaska
99775
(N.A.R.)
3 Green Engineering, Inc.
2215
Curtis St.
Berkeley, California 94702
(L.P.)
Geophysical information, including deep-crustal seismic reflection,
magnetotelluric (MT), gravity, and magnetic data, cross the
aftershock zone of the 3 November 2002 Mw 7.9 Denali
fault earthquake. These data and aftershock seismicity, jointly interpreted,
reveal the crustal structure of the right-lateral-slip Denali fault and the
eastern Alaska Range orogen, as well as the relationship between this structure
and seismicity. North of the Denali fault, strong seismic reflections from
within the Alaska Range orogen show features that dip as steeply as 25°
north and extend downward to depths between 20 and 25 km. These reflections
reveal crustal structures, probably ductile shear zones, that most likely formed
during the Late Cretaceous, but these structures appear to be inactive, having
produced little seismicity during the past 20 years. Furthermore, seismic
reflections mainly dip north, whereas alignments in aftershock hypocenters dip
south. The Denali fault is nonreflective, but modeling of MT,
gravity, and magnetic data suggests that the Denali fault dips steeply to
vertically. However, in an alternative structural model, the Denali fault is
defined by one of the reflection bands that dips to the north and flattens into
the middle crust of the Alaska Range orogen. Modeling of MT data
indicates a rock body, having low electrical resistivity (>10
·m), that lies mainly at depths greater than 10 km, directly
beneath aftershocks of the Denali fault earthquake. The maximum depth of
aftershocks along the Denali fault is 10 km. This shallow depth may arise from a
higher-than-normal geothermal gradient. Alternatively, the low electrical
resistivity of deep rocks along the Denali fault may be associated with fluids
that have weakened the lower crust and helped determine the depth extent of the
aftershock zone.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bouchon and H. Karabulut The Aftershock Signature of Supershear Earthquakes Science, June 6, 2008; 320(5881): 1323 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Fuis, T. E. Moore, G. Plafker, T. M. Brocher, M. A. Fisher, W. D. Mooney, W. J. Nokleberg, R. A. Page, B. C. Beaudoin, N. I. Christensen, et al. Trans-Alaska Crustal Transect and continental evolution involving subduction underplating and synchronous foreland thrusting Geology, March 1, 2008; 36(3): 267 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Ratchkovski, S. Wiemer, and R. A. Hansen Seismotectonics of the Central Denali Fault, Alaska, and the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S156 - S174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |