Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2004; v. 94; no. 6; p. 2280-2298; DOI: 10.1785/0120040003
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Seggern, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic Background Noise and Detection Threshold in the Southern Great Basin Digital Seismic Network

David H. von Seggern1

1 Nevada Seismological Laboratory
University of Nevada
1664 North Virginia Street
Reno, Nevada 89557-0079
vonseg{at}seismo.unr.edu

This study compares predicted seismic thresholds to actual thresholds for a high-resolution, three-component digital network in the southern part of the Great Basin of Nevada, centered on Yucca Mountain, the designated site of a high-level nuclear-waste geologic repository. In order to do this comparison, it was necessary to quantify carefully the statistical properties of noise, including mean, variance, and correlation, and the statistical properties of signals, including mean, variance, and site effects. It was also necessary to relate the noise levels to the long-term average (LTA) and the signal levels to the short-term average (STA) used in conventional signal-detector algorithms. Combining these attributes with a random-earthquake simulator enables one to predict the seismic threshold of the network for a given source area.

Initial predicted thresholds for the network were found to be approximately 0.3 to 0.4 magnitude unit less than the actual thresholds achieved by the network. There are several reasons for this, but the major reason seems to be the inability to time small signals that are automatically detected. A predicted threshold map for the network was constructed by accounting for the difference initially seen between predicted and actual thresholds. This map indicates that the network detects all events within 10 km of Yucca Mountain with three or more stations down to a threshold of roughly ML –0.5, whereas events near the fringes of the network are similarly detected down to a threshold of roughly ML +0.5. The simulations show that the network-estimated magnitude is biased upward as true magnitude approaches the threshold; this bias may be as large as roughly +0.3 for events near the threshold.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. M. Tibuleac, D. H. von Seggern, J. G. Anderson, K. W. Smith, A. Aburto, and T. Rennie
Location and Magnitude Estimation of the 9 October 2006 Korean Nuclear Explosion Using the Southern Great Basin Digital Seismic Network as a Large-Aperture Array
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 756 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.