HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Menke, W. Articles by Schaff, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Absolute Earthquake Locations with Differential Data

¹ Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
61 Route 9W
Palisades, New York 10964
menke@ldeo.columbia.edu

Notwithstanding the commonly held wisdom that "you can’t determine the absolute location of earthquakes using the double-difference method," you can. We present a way of visualizing double-difference data, and use it to show how differential arrival-time data can, in principle, be used to determine the absolute locations of earthquakes. We then analyze the differential form of Geiger’s Method, which is the basis of many double-difference earthquake-location algorithms, and show that it can be used to make estimates of the absolute location of earthquake sources. Finally, we examine absolute-location error in one earthquake-location scenario, using Monte Carlo simulations that include both measurement error and velocity model error, and show that the double-difference method produces absolute locations with errors that are comparable in magnitude, or even less, than traditional methods. The improvement in absolute locations arises from exactly the same, and often-cited, reasons that the double-difference method yields superior relative locations: observations of differential travel times determined via cross correlation have a much smaller error than observations of absolute travel times determined via phase picking; and predictions of differential travel times are less sensitive to unmodeled near-surface heterogeneity than are predictions of absolute travel times. Absolute earthquake locations that are already routinely produced by most implementations of the double-difference method have a better accuracy than has been credited.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Hardebeck, A. J. Michael, and T. M. Brocher Seismic Velocity Structure and Seismotectonics of the Eastern San Francisco Bay Region, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 826 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lomnitz Three Theorems of Earthquake Location Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]