Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2004; v. 94; no. 6; p. 2028-2036; DOI: 10.1785/0120030104
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spudich, P.
Right arrow Articles by Guatteri, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Effect of Bandwidth Limitations on the Inference of Earthquake Slip-Weakening Distance from Seismograms

Paul Spudich1 and Mariagiovanna Guatteri2

1 U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94205
spudich{at}usgs.gov
 (P.S.)

2 Swiss Re
175 King St.
Armonk, New York 10504
Mariagiovanna_Guatteri{at}swissre.com
 (M.G.)

Numerous researchers have obtained estimates of slip-weakening distance, Dc, and fracture energy for recent earthquakes. Dc is often observed to be a significant fraction of the total slip and tends to correlate with total slip. Although these observations may well be true of real earthquakes, we show that low-pass filtering of strong-motion seismograms can also produce some of these effects in inverted rupture models. We test the accuracy of Dc estimates by calculating them in low-pass-filtered versions of models A and B of Guatteri and Spudich (2000). Models A and B are two different rupture models for a hypothetical M 6.5 earthquake, and they have nearly identical rupture time, slip, and stress-drop distributions, and nearly identical predicted seismograms, but Dc for model B is about twice that for model A. By low-pass filtering slip models A and B at 1.0 Hz, we simulate the blurring effects of band-limited waveform inversions on these slip models. At each point on a fault, {03104-eq001} is defined to be the slip at the time of the peak slip speed at that point. Low-pass filtering the slip models causes an upward bias in Dc inferred from stress-slip curves, and it causes an artificial correlation between {03104-eq002} and the total slip. Low-pass filtering might also bias fracture energy high and radiated energy low. These biases should be considered when interpreting Dc derived from band-limited slip models of real earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Mikumo and E. Fukuyama
Near-Source Released Energy in Relation to Fracture Energy on Earthquake Faults
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1177 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.