|
|
||||||||
1 U.S. Geological Survey
345
Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California
94205
spudich{at}usgs.gov
(P.S.)
2 Swiss Re
175 King St.
Armonk,
New York
10504
Mariagiovanna_Guatteri{at}swissre.com
(M.G.)
Numerous researchers have obtained estimates of slip-weakening distance,
Dc, and fracture energy for recent earthquakes.
Dc is often observed to be a significant fraction of the
total slip and tends to correlate with total slip. Although these observations
may well be true of real earthquakes, we show that low-pass filtering of
strong-motion seismograms can also produce some of these effects in inverted
rupture models. We test the accuracy of Dc estimates by
calculating them in low-pass-filtered versions of models A and B of
Guatteri and Spudich
(2000). Models A and B are two different rupture models for a
hypothetical M 6.5 earthquake, and they have nearly identical rupture
time, slip, and stress-drop distributions, and nearly identical predicted
seismograms, but Dc for model B is about twice that for
model A. By low-pass filtering slip models A and B at 1.0 Hz, we simulate the
blurring effects of band-limited waveform inversions on these slip models. At
each point on a fault,
is defined to be
the slip at the time of the peak slip speed at that point. Low-pass filtering
the slip models causes an upward bias in Dc inferred from
stress-slip curves, and it causes an artificial correlation between
and the total slip.
Low-pass filtering might also bias fracture energy high and radiated energy low.
These biases should be considered when interpreting Dc
derived from band-limited slip models of real earthquakes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Mikumo and E. Fukuyama Near-Source Released Energy in Relation to Fracture Energy on Earthquake Faults Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1177 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |