HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mazzotti, S. Articles by Adams, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Variability of Near-Term Probability for the Next Great Earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction Zone

Geological Survey of Canada
9860 West Saanich Road
Sidney BC, V8L4B2, Canada
smazzotti{at}NRCan.gc.ca
(S.M.)
Geological Survey of Canada
7 Observatory Crescent
Ottawa, ON, K1A0Y3, Canada
adams{at}seismo.nrcan.gc.ca
(J.A.)

Manuscript received 26 February 2004.

The threat of a great (M 9) earthquake along the Cascadia subduction zone is evidenced by both paleoseismology data and current strain accumulation along the fault. On the basis of recent information on the characteristics of this subduction system, we estimate the conditional probabilities of a great earthquake occurring within the next 50 years and their variabilities. The most important variation is associated with the existence of episodic slow slip on the deep portion of the subduction interface. We show that these events modulate the conditional probability dramatically over their 14-month cycle. During the 2-week slow-slip events, the weekly probability of a great earthquake is about 30 to 100 times as high as it is during any week of the rest of the year. Near-term probabilities also vary significantly with the assumed distribution of earthquake recurrence intervals. Under a reference scenario of unimodal distribution of recurrence intervals (about 500-600 years), the 50-year conditional probability is low (0-12% at a 95% confidence interval). However, under a tantalizing bimodal distribution hypothesis, this probability could be either four times as high (6-45%) or four times as low (less than 1%), depending on whether the current interval is short (350 years) or long (850 years).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Trehu, J. Braunmiller, and J. L. Nabelek Probable low-angle thrust earthquakes on the Juan de Fuca-North America plate boundary Geology, February 1, 2008; 36(2): 127 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Brudzinski and R. M. Allen Segmentation in episodic tremor and slip all along Cascadia Geology, October 1, 2007; 35(10): 907 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-K. Shen, Q. Wang, R. Burgmann, Y. Wan, and J. Ning Pole-Tide Modulation of Slow Slip Events at Circum-Pacific Subduction Zones Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 2009 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]