|
|
||||||||
Article |
Center for Earthquake Research and Information
University of Memphis
Memphis, Tennessee 38152
bodin{at}ceri.memphis.edu
(P.B.)
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
Rome, Italy
(L.M., A.A.)
Manuscript received 29 September 2003.
We studied the excitation, propagation, and site effects in the Kachchh basin of India by using ground-motion recordings from a temporary seismograph network deployed to study aftershocks of the Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake of 26 January 2001. The Kachchh basin has been proposed as a useful analog region for studying hazard in other earthquake-prone but slowly deforming regions, such as the central United States. The earthquakes we studied ranged in size from about M 2 to M 5.2, and travel paths ranged from a few kilometers to about a hundred kilometers. There was a broad range of focal depths among the aftershocks, so the data were divided into two overlapping subsets to test the sensitivity of the derived propagation and source parameters to focal depth. Parameters we constrained include the source excitation terms (related to stress drop), a frequency-dependent attenuation operator, a geometric spreading function, and an operator to account for site effects. Our results indicate that seismic-wave attenuation in Kachchh crust is very low, similar to other continental intraplate areas such as central and eastern North America. We also estimated seismic moments and stress drops for the earthquakes by fitting single-corner-frequency source-model spectra to the observed spectra, corrected for propagation by using our derived parameters. Stress drops were found to scale with seismic moment and to be rather high overall. By using a stochastic point-source model to estimate mainshock ground motions, we found that the distance decay of expected peak ground motions, assuming a stress drop of 15-20 MPa, compare well with the scant observations for the Bhuj earthquake. Ground-motion predictions for Kachchh, based on Bhuj aftershock data, support the idea that the region may have similar hazard to proposed analog areas in North America.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Sharma, A. K. Gupta, D. K. Devi, D. Kumar, S. S. Teotia, and B. K. Rastogi Attenuation of High-Frequency Seismic Waves in Kachchh Region, Gujarat, India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2325 - 2340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mandal, U. Dutta, and R. K. Chadha Estimation of Site Response in the Kachchh Seismic Zone, Gujarat, India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2559 - 2566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fatehi and R. B. Herrmann High-Frequency Ground-Motion Scaling in the Pacific Northwest and in Northern and Central California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 709 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Singh, S. D. Pimprikar, B. K. Bansal, J. F. Pacheco, R. S. Dattatrayam, and G. Suresh An Analysis of the Mw 4.7 Jabalpur, India, Earthquake of 16 October 2000: Toward Ground-Motion Estimation in the Region from Future Events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1475 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Malagnini, K. Mayeda, R. Uhrhammer, A. Akinci, and R. B. Herrmann A Regional Ground-Motion Excitation/Attenuation Model for the San Francisco Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 843 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Padhy, U. Wegler, and M. Korn Seismogram Envelope Inversion Using a Multiple Isotropic Scattering Model: Application to Aftershocks of the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 222 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jaiswal and R. Sinha Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation for Peninsular India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 318 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cramer An Assessment of the Impact of the 2003 EPRI Ground-Motion Prediction Models on the USGS National Seismic-Hazard Maps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1159 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Malagnini, P. Bodin, K. Mayeda, and A. Akinci Unbiased Moment-Rate Spectra and Absolute Site Effects in the Kachchh Basin, India, from the Analysis of the Aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 456 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Calderoni, A. Rovelli, G. Cultrera, R. M. Azzara, and G. Di Giulio Assessment of Ground Motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake Using Source Scaling Law Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2342 - 2363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Scognamiglio, L. Malagnini, and A. Akinci Ground-Motion Scaling in Eastern Sicily, Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 568 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |