HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boore, D. M. Articles by Shakal, A. F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A Study of Possible Ground-Motion Amplification at the Coyote Lake Dam, California

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
boore{at}usgs.gov, jtinsley{at}usgs.gov
(D.M.B., J.C.T.)
California Geological Survey
Strong Motion Instrumentation Program
801 K Street
Sacramento, California 95814
vgraizer{at}consrv.ca.gov, tshakal{at}consrv.ca.gov
(V.M.G, A.F.S.)

Manuscript received 22 July 2003.

The abutment site at the Coyote Lake Dam recorded an unusually large peak acceleration of 1.29g during the 1984 Morgan Hill earthquake. Following this earthquake another strong-motion station was installed about 700 m downstream from the abutment station. We study all events (seven) recorded on these stations, using ratios of peak accelerations, spectral ratios, and particle motion polarization (using holograms) to investigate the relative ground motion at the two sites. We find that in all but one case the motion at the abutment site is larger than the downstream site over a broad frequency band. The polarizations are similar for the two sites for a given event, but can vary from one event to another. This suggests that the dam itself is not strongly influencing the records. Although we can be sure that the relative motion is usually larger at the abutment site, we cannot conclude that there is anomalous site amplification at the abutment site. The downstream site could have lower-than-usual near-surface amplifications. On the other hand, the geology near the abutment site is extremely complex and includes fault slivers, with rapid lateral changes in materials and presumably seismic velocities. For this reason alone, the abutment site should not be considered a normal free-field site.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Barnaba, E. Priolo, A. Vuan, and M. Romanelli Site Effect of the Strong-Motion Site at Tolmezzo-Ambiesta Dam in Northeastern Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 339 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Tang, C. R. Jackson, X.-Y. Zhou, and Q.-L. Lin Strong Ground Motions Observed at the UPSAR during the 2003 M 6.5 San Simeon and 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield, California, Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S159 - S182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G.-Q. Wang, G.-Q. Tang, D. M. Boore, G. Van Ness Burbach, C. R. Jackson, X.-Y. Zhou, and Q.-L. Lin Surface Waves in the Western Taiwan Coastal Plain from an Aftershock of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 821 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]