Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2004; v. 94; no. 3; p. 856-866; DOI: 10.1785/0120030084
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, W.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Eberhart-Phillips, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Earthquake Relocation Using Cross-Correlation Time Delay Estimates Verified with the Bispectrum Method

Wen-Xuan Du, Clifford H. Thurber and Donna Eberhart-Phillips*

Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
(W.-X.D., C.H.T.)

Institute of Geological and Nuclear Science
Private Bag 1930
Dunedin, New Zealand
(D.E.-P.)

Cross-correlation (CC) determined relative time delays, or related differential travel times, between pairs of seismic events at the same station are often used as input data to improve earthquake relocation results. Researchers generally select those time delays with associated CC coefficients larger than a chosen threshold. When two similar time series are contaminated by correlated noise sources, the relative time delay between them calculated with the CC technique is sometimes not reliable. Noise sources at a station for different events can be partially correlated or just randomly correlated. In this work, we use the bispectrum (BS) method, which works in the third-order spectral domain, to check the reliability of the CC determined time delay. We calculate two time delays with the BS method, one using the bandpass-filtered waveforms and the other with the raw data, and use them to verify (select or reject) the CC estimate computed with the filtered waveforms. We apply this technique to obtain bispectrum-verified CC differential times for 822 New Zealand earthquakes in the Wellington area. Our work demonstrates that the CC time delays verified with the BS method provide improved (smaller root mean square residual and more clustered) earthquake relocation results compared to those selected with the standard threshold criterion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. D. Pesicek, C. H. Thurber, H. R. DeShon, S. G. Prejean, and H. Zhang
Three-Dimensional P-Wave Velocity Structure and Precise Earthquake Relocation at Great Sitkin Volcano, Alaska
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2428 - 2448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. P. Schaff and F. Waldhauser
Waveform Cross-Correlation-Based Differential Travel-Time Measurements at the Northern California Seismic Network
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2446 - 2461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Shearer, E. Hauksson, and G. Lin
Southern California Hypocenter Relocation with Waveform Cross-Correlation, Part 2: Results Using Source-Specific Station Terms and Cluster Analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 904 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.