HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Electronic Supplement Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scherbaum, F. Articles by Cotton, F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On the Conversion of Source-to-Site Distance Measures for Extended Earthquake Source Models

Institute of Geosciences
University of Potsdam
Potsdam, Germany
(F.S., J.S.)

Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique
University of Joseph Fourier
Grenolde, France
(F.C.)

One of the major challenges in engineering seismology is the reliable prediction of site-specific ground motion for particular earthquakes, observed at specific distances. For larger events, a special problem arises, at short distances, with the source-to-site distance measure, because distance metrics based on a point-source model are no longer appropriate. As a consequence, different attenuation relations differ in the distance metric that they use. In addition to being a source of confusion, this causes problems to quantitatively compare or combine different ground-motion models; for example, in the context of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment, in cases where ground-motion models with different distance metrics occupy neighboring branches of a logic tree. In such a situation, very crude assumptions about source sizes and orientations often have to be used to be able to derive an estimate of the particular metric required. Even if this solves the problem of providing a number to put into the attenuation relation, a serious problem remains. When converting distance measures, the corresponding uncertainties map onto the estimated ground motions according to the laws of error propagation. To make matters worse, conversion of distance metrics can cause the uncertainties of the adapted ground-motion model to become magnitude and distance dependent, even if they are not in the original relation. To be able to treat this problem quantitatively, the variability increase caused by the distance metric conversion has to be quantified. For this purpose, we have used well established scaling laws to determine explicit distance conversion relations using regression analysis on simulated data. We demonstrate that, for all practical purposes, most popular distance metrics can be related to the Joyner-Boore distance using models based on gamma distributions to express the shape of some "residual function." The functional forms are magnitude and distance dependent and are expressed as polynomials. We compare the performance of these relations with manually derived individual distance estimates for the Landers, the Imperial Valley, and the Chi-Chi earthquakes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Akkar and J. J. Bommer Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 511 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Beyer and J. J. Bommer Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1512 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Scherbaum, F. Cotton, and H. Staedtke The Estimation of Minimum-Misfit Stochastic Models from Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 427 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Scherbaum, J. J. Bommer, H. Bungum, F. Cotton, and N. A. Abrahamson Composite Ground-Motion Models and Logic Trees: Methodology, Sensitivities, and Uncertainties Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1575 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Mai, P. Spudich, and J. Boatwright Hypocenter Locations in Finite-Source Rupture Models Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 965 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bommer, F. Scherbaum, H. Bungum, F. Cotton, F. Sabetta, and N. A. Abrahamson On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 377 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]