Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2004; v. 94; no. 2; p. 722-739; DOI: 10.1785/0120000286
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Lg Group Velocity: A Depth Discriminant Revisited

G. Eli Baker, Jeff Stevens and Heming Xu

Science Applications Corporation International (SAIC)
10260 Campus Point Drive, MS A1
San Diego, California 92121

Manuscript received 5 December 2000.

Lg group velocities are slower for very shallow events than for deeper crustal events in both southern California and Israel. An Lg group velocity depth discriminant applied to data below 1 Hz was proposed and then abandoned two decades ago, but a more precise measure of the energy distribution within Lg leads to the conclusion that higher frequency Lg group velocity may identify event depth. Because of its practical importance to nuclear monitoring and its implications for the generation and propagation of Lg, we quantify and model the delay of shallow-event Lg.

We consider two mechanisms. First, shallower, slower modes are more strongly excited by shallow events, while deeper events excite faster modes. Second, Rg-to-Lg scattering for shallow events could introduce a time delay into Lg relative to Lg generated directly by the source. Further, since Rg propagates close to the surface, Rg scattering would also preferentially scatter into the shallower, slower modes. The depth dependence of modal excitation is therefore important for either mechanism, but Rg scattering could increase the time delays.

Mode and finite-difference simulations demonstrate the feasibility of both hypotheses. We consider the implications of related observations for the source of the Lg delay, including predictions and observations of the frequency dependence of Lg delays.

We conclude that Lg group velocity variation with event depth can be explained by preferential modal excitation and may have the potential to identify very shallow events and events too deep to be man-made. Practical application of the procedure will require regionalization to account for variations in Earth structure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K.-Y. Chun and G. A. Henderson
Lg Attenuation near the North Korean Border with China, Part II: Model Development from the 2006 Nuclear Explosion in North Korea
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 3030 - 3038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. N. Gupta and H. J. Patton
Difference Spectrograms: A New Method for Studying S-Wave Generation from Explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2460 - 2468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. R. Ford, D. S. Dreger, K. Mayeda, W. R. Walter, L. Malagnini, and W. S. Phillips
Regional Attenuation in Northern California: A Comparison of Five 1D Q Methods
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 2033 - 2046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.