Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2004; v. 94; no. 2; p. 591-597; DOI: 10.1785/0120030105
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boore, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Estimating Vs(30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from Shallow Velocity Models (Depths < 30 m)

David M. Boore

U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Rd., MS 977
Menlo Park, California 94025
boore{at}usgs.gov

Manuscript received 29 May 2003.

The average velocity to 30 m [Vs(30)] is a widely used parameter for classifying sites to predict their potential to amplify seismic shaking. In many cases, however, models of shallow shear-wave velocities, from which Vs(30) can be computed, do not extend to 30 m. If the data for these cases are to be used, some method of extrapolating the velocities must be devised. Four methods for doing this are described here and are illustrated using data from 135 boreholes in California for which the velocity model extends to at least 30 m. Methods using correlations between shallow velocity and Vs(30) result in significantly less bias for shallow models than the simplest method of assuming that the lowermost velocity extends to 30 m. In addition, for all methods the percent of sites misclassified is generally less than 10% and falls to negligible values for velocity models extending to at least 25 m. Although the methods using correlations do a better job on average of estimating Vs(30), the simplest method will generally result in a lower value of Vs(30) and thus yield a more conservative estimate of ground motion [which generally increases as Vs(30) decreases].




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Macias, G. M. Atkinson, and D. Motazedian
Ground-Motion Attenuation, Source, and Site Effects for the 26 September 2003 M 8.1 Tokachi-Oki Earthquake Sequence
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1947 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Pousse, L. F. Bonilla, F. Cotton, and L. Margerin
Nonstationary Stochastic Simulation of Strong Ground Motion Time Histories Including Natural Variability: Application to the K-Net Japanese Database
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2103 - 2117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.