Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2004; v. 94; no. 1; p. 64-75; DOI: 10.1785/0120020122
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakun, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hopper, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Magnitudes and Locations of the 1811–1812 New Madrid, Missouri, and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquakes

W. H. Bakun and M. G. Hopper

U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
(W.H.B.)

U.S. Geological Survey
1711 Illinois Street
Golden, Colorado 80401
(M.G.H.)

We estimate locations and moment magnitudes M and their uncertainties for the three largest events in the 1811–1812 sequence near New Madrid, Missouri, and for the 1 September 1886 event near Charleston, South Carolina. The intensity magnitude MI, our preferred estimate of M, is 7.6 for the 16 December 1811 event that occurred in the New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) on the Bootheel lineament or on the Blytheville seismic zone. MI is 7.5 for the 23 January 1812 event for a location on the New Madrid north zone of the NMSZ and 7.8 for the 7 February 1812 event that occurred on the Reelfoot blind thrust of the NMSZ. Our preferred locations for these events are located on those NMSZ segments preferred by Johnston and Schweig (1996). Our estimates of M are 0.1–0.4 M units less than those of Johnston (1996b) and 0.3–0.5 M units greater than those of Hough et al. (2000). MI is 6.9 for the 1 September 1886 event for a location at the Summerville–Middleton Place cluster of recent small earthquakes located about 30 km northwest of Charleston.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. E. Hough
Cataloging the 1811-1812 New Madrid, Central U.S., Earthquake Sequence
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2009; 80(6): 1045 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
I. Dura-Gomez and P. Talwani
Finding Faults in the Charleston Area, South Carolina: 1. Seismological Data
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2009; 80(5): 883 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. V. Panno, C. C. Lundstrom, K. C. Hackley, B. B. Curry, B. W. Fouke, and Z. Zhang
Major Earthquakes Recorded by Speleothems in Midwestern U.S. Caves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2009; 99(4): 2147 - 2154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
J. S. Hebden and S. Stein
Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Maps for the New Madrid Seismic Zone and Charleston, South Carolina, Areas
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 12 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
A. M. Shumway
Focal Mechanisms in the Northeast New Madrid Seismic Zone
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2008; 79(3): 469 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. E. Hough and P. Pande
Quantifying the Media Bias in Intensity Surveys: Lessons from the 2001 Bhuj, India, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2007; 97(2): 638 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
G. M. Atkinson
Challenges in seismic hazard analysis for continental interiors
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 329 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
J. H. Crandell
Policy development and uncertainty in earthquake risk in the New Madrid seismic zone
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 425(0): 375 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. C. Jaume
Shear Wave Velocity Profiles via Seismic Cone Penetration Test and Refraction Microtremor Techniques at ANSS Strong Motion Sites in Charleston, South Carolina
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2006; 77(6): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. D. Andrus, C. D. Fairbanks, J. Zhang, W. M. Camp III, T. J. Casey, T. J. Cleary, and W. B. Wright
Shear-Wave Velocity and Seismic Response of Near-Surface Sediments in Charleston, South Carolina
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1897 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
Z. Wang and E. W. Woolery
Recordings from the Deepest Borehole in the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2006; 77(2): 148 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. M. Olson, R. A. Green, and S. F. Obermeier
Revised Magnitude-bound Relation for the Wabash Valley Seismic Zone of the Central United States
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2005; 76(6): 756 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. E. Hough, R. Bilham, K. Mueller, W. Stephenson, R. Williams, and J. Odum
Wagon Loads of Sand Blows in White County, Illinois
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2005; 76(3): 373 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
M. Lamontagne
Making Earthquake Notifications More Useful to Emergency Managers
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2005; 76(3): 387 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
R. Street, D. Hoffman, and J. Kiefer
Comment on "Survey of Historical Buildings Predating the 1811-1812 New Madrid Earthquakes and Magnitude Estimation on Structural Fragility" by Vladimir G. Kochkin and Jay H. Crandell
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2004; 75(6): 744 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
W. H. Bakun and M. G. Hopper
Historical Seismic Activity in the Central United States
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2004; 75(5): 564 - 574.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
A. Frankel
How Can Seismic Hazard around the New Madrid Seismic Zone Be Similar to That in California?
Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2004; 75(5): 575 - 586.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.