Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2004; v. 94; no. 1; p. 314-319; DOI: 10.1785/0120030159
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanamori, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rivera, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

Static and Dynamic Scaling Relations for Earthquakes and Their Implications for Rupture Speed and Stress Drop

Hiroo Kanamori and Luis Rivera

Seismological Laboratory
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California 91125
(H.K.)

EOST-IPGS
Université Louis Pasteur
5, Rue René Descartes
F67084 Strasbourg, France
(L.R.)

We investigate the relation between a static scaling relation, M0 (seismic moment) versus f0 (spectral corner frequency), and a dynamic scaling relation between M0 and ER (radiated energy). These two scaling relations are not independent. Using the variational calculus, we show that the ratio = ER/M0 has a lower bound, min, for given M0 and f0. If the commonly used static scaling relation () holds, then min must be scale independent and should not depend on the magnitude, Mw. The observed values of for large earthquakes [e.g., (Mw 7)] are close to min. The observed values of for small earthquakes are controversial, but the reported values of (Mw 3) range from 1 to 0.1 of (Mw 7), suggesting that min may decrease as Mw decreases. To accommodate this possibility, we need to modify the M0 versus f0 scaling relation to , ({epsilon} ≤ 1), which is allowable within the observational uncertainties. This modification leads to a scale-dependent min, min {propto} 101.5Mw{epsilon}/(3+{epsilon}), and a scale-dependent {Delta}{sigma}sV3 ({Delta}{sigma}s = static stress drop, V = rupture speed), {Delta}{sigma}sV3 {propto} 101.5Mw{epsilon}/(3+{epsilon}), and it can accommodate the range of presently available data on these scaling relations. We note that the scaling relation, {Delta}{sigma}sV3 {propto} 101.5Mw{epsilon}/(3+{epsilon}), suggests that even if is scale independent and (i.e., {epsilon} = 0), {Delta}{sigma}s is not necessarily scale independent, although such scale independence is often implied. Small and large earthquakes can have significantly different {Delta}{sigma}s and V; if varies with Mw, as suggested by many data sets, the difference can be even larger, which has important implications for rupture physics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Courboulex, J. Converset, J. Balestra, and B. Delouis
Ground-Motion Simulations of the 2004 Mw 6.4 Les Saintes, Guadeloupe, Earthquake Using Ten Smaller Events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 116 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Beauval, L. Honore, and F. Courboulex
Ground-Motion Variability and Implementation of a Probabilistic-Deterministic Hazard Method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2992 - 3002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Galluzzo, E. Del Pezzo, M. La Rocca, M. Castellano, and F. Bianco
Source Scaling and Site Effects at Vesuvius Volcano
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2009; 99(3): 1705 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. Cotton, G. Pousse, F. Bonilla, and F. Scherbaum
On the Discrepancy of Recent European Ground-Motion Observations and Predictions from Empirical Models: Analysis of KiK-net Accelerometric Data and Point-Sources Stochastic Simulations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2244 - 2261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Causse, F. Cotton, C. Cornou, and P.-Y. Bard
Calibrating Median and Uncertainty Estimates for a Practical Use of Empirical Green's Functions Technique
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 344 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. Calderoni, A. Rovelli, G. Cultrera, R. M. Azzara, and G. Di Giulio
Assessment of Ground Motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake Using Source Scaling Law
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2342 - 2363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Takahashi, H. Sato, M. Ohtake, and K. Obara
Scale Dependence of Apparent Stress for Earthquakes along the Subducting Pacific Plate in Northeastern Honshu, Japan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1334 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Kohrs-Sansorny, F. Courboulex, M. Bour, and A. Deschamps
A Two-Stage Method for Ground-Motion Simulation Using Stochastic Summation of Small Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1387 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. J. McGuire
Estimating Finite Source Properties of Small Earthquake Ruptures
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 377 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.