HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parolai, S. Articles by Richwalski, S. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The Importance of Converted Waves in Comparing H/V and RSM Site Response Estimates

GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Telegrafenberg
14473 Potsdam, Germany

The application of the horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectral ratio technique to earthquake recordings can lead to significant differences in the estimate of the site response compared to that produced by the reference-site method (RSM). In particular, whereas the estimates of the resonance frequency from the two methods are fairly consistent, the levels of amplification are not. Using numerical modeling based on an improved Thompson–Haskell propagator matrix method, we were able to isolate the contribution of pure and converted waves to the site response. We show that the conversion of body waves at the sediment–bedrock interface leads to differences in the site response estimates obtained by the H/V method and the RSM. Such differences are consistent with observations in the field. In particular, the lower level of amplification obtained by the H/V method at frequencies higher than the fundamental one is due to a transfer of energy onto the vertical component caused by S- to P-wave conversion. Applying the RSM technique to the vertical as well as the horizontal component of the P-wave window, we obtain stable estimates of the fundamental resonance frequency that are consistent with 1D resonance for vertically incident P and S waves, respectively. The amplification from the P-wave window of the horizontal component might be considered as a lower boundary.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Assimaki, W. Li, J. H. Steidl, and K. Tsuda Site Amplification and Attenuation via Downhole Array Seismogram Inversion: A Comparative Study of the 2003 Miyagi-Oki Aftershock Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 301 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Pratt and T. M. Brocher Site Response and Attenuation in the Puget Lowland, Washington State Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 536 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Di Giacomo, M. R. Gallipoli, M. Mucciarelli, S. Parolai, and S. M. Richwalski Analysis and Modeling of HVSR in the Presence of a Velocity Inversion: The Case of Venosa, Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2364 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Comparison of Different Site Response Estimation Techniques Using Aftershocks of the 1999 Izmit Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 1096 - 1108.