Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2004; v. 94; no. 1; p. 147-154; DOI: 10.1785/0120030027
© 2004 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shragge, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

The Effect of Forearc Mantle Serpentinization on Ground Motions from Megathrust and Intraslab Events in the Cascadia Subduction Zone

A. F. McNeill, M. G. Bostock, G. C. Rogers and J. C. Shragge

Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
(A.F.M., M.G.B.)

Pacific Geoscience Centre
Geological Survey of Canada
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
(G.C.R.)

Department of Geophysics
Stanford University
Stanford, California
(J.C.S.)

We re-examine large-scale structural controls on ground motions from megathrust and intraslab events in the Cascadia subduction zone in light of recent evidence pointing to a highly hydrated and serpentinized forearc mantle. We employ 2D P-SV pseudospectral synthetic seismograms, double-couple line sources, and a structural model for Cascadia based on the study of Bostock et al. (2002) that includes both serpentinized forearc mantle and eclogitized oceanic crust. As in a previous study (Cohee et al., 1991), we note that ground motions at greater epicentral distances are dominated by postcritical reflections from the Moho. However, in our modeling of megathrust earthquakes, we find that the presence or absence of serpentinized forearc mantle dictates whether maximum ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban corridor (Portland, Seattle, Vancouver, Victoria) result from postcritical reflection at the oceanic Moho or continental Moho, respectively, as well as their range dependence. Moreover, serpentinization reduces the efficacy of the subducting oceanic crust as a wave guide by allowing energy to escape through the overlying wedge. This effect is particularly important for intraslab (Wadati-Benioff) events, as it allows focusing of upward-propagating energy toward the surface that would otherwise be redirected downward. Consequently, ground motions from intraslab sources at lower frequencies (0-2 Hz) can be up to 5 times greater than those modeled in the absence of a serpentinized forearc mantle. At higher frequencies, the lower Q of serpentine may act to reduce this amplification.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. M. Zobin and J. A. Pizano-Silva
Macroseismic Study of the Mw 7.5 21 January 2003 Colima, Mexico, Across-Trench Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1221 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. A. Ichinose, H. K. Thio, and P. G. Somerville
Moment Tensor and Rupture Model for the 1949 Olympia, Washington, Earthquake and Scaling Relations for Cascadia and Global Intraslab Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1029 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Seismological Society of America.