| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Article |
Department of Earth Sciences
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, California 92521
(D.D.O.)
Department of Geological Sciences
San Diego State University
5500 Campanile Drive
San Diego, California 92182
(S.M.D.)
Department of Earth Sciences
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California 90089-0740
(Y.-G.L.)
Department of Earth and Space Sciences
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California 90095
(J.E.V.)
Manuscript received 31 January 2003.
The 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake ruptured a complex fault system with a branched structure in the north. This fault geometry and slip pattern presents a puzzle, because the northwest branch of this system should be in the stress shadow of the north branch, upon which nucleation likely took place. Through 3D dynamic models of this event, we show that the ability of rupture to propagate to the northwest branch most likely depends on the fact that rupture did not proceed to the surface on the north branch. This slip pattern leads to part of the northwest branch being brought above its failure stress and to subsequent rupture propagation and slip occurring on that branch. A similar effect can be seen in the case in which rupture is constrained not to propagate to the base of the north branch. Models with slip over the entire north branch do not produce rupture propagation and slip on the northwest branch. The results are robust with respect to details of the prestress pattern and hypocenter location. Large heterogeneity over small length scales in the final stress pattern is a natural product of the models, even when the initial stress field is quite homogeneous. We also find that the interaction between fault geometry and stress pattern helps to explain other observations in this event, including slow rupture propagation on the northwest branch. The results help to show that 3D dynamic effects may be crucial in determining rupture propagation and slip behavior on geometrically complex fault systems, although these effects may be hard to predict without detailed knowledge of the stress pattern and fault geometry prior to earthquakes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Adda-Bedia and R. Madariaga Seismic Radiation from a Kink on an Antiplane Fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2291 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Fukuyama and T. Mikumo Dynamic Rupture Propagation during the 1891 Nobi, Central Japan, Earthquake: A Possible Extension to the Branched Faults Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1257 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Oglesby The Dynamics of Strike-Slip Step-Overs with Linking Dip-Slip Faults Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1604 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. T. Aagaard, G. Anderson, and K. W. Hudnut Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the Transition from Thrust to Strike-Slip Motion in the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S190 - S201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Oglesby, D. S. Dreger, R. A. Harris, N. Ratchkovski, and R. Hansen Inverse Kinematic and Forward Dynamic Models of the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S214 - S233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
