Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2003; v. 93; no. 6; p. 2434-2444; DOI: 10.1785/0120020236
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardebeck, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Using S/P Amplitude Ratios to Constrain the Focal Mechanisms of Small Earthquakes

Jeanne L. Hardebeck* and Peter M. Shearer

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California 92093

Manuscript received 27 November 2002.

We test whether S-wave/P-wave amplitude ratio data can improve the computed focal mechanisms of small earthquakes, using events from two southern California aftershock sequences. The observed S/P ratios are generally consistent with the expected mechanisms, implying that S/P ratios can in fact be useful in constraining the focal mechanisms of small events. However, we also find that noise in the observations leads to scatter in the S/P ratios of factors of 2, and sometimes higher. This scatter limits the usefulness of the S/P ratios in two ways: (1) the focal mechanism cannot simply be fit to S/P amplitude data alone without accounting for the noise in a more sophisticated focal mechanism inversion process; (2) while the amplitude ratios may improve poorly constrained mechanisms, they are less useful in refining solutions that are already relatively well constrained.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Environmental and Engineering GeoscienceHome page
V. S. CRONIN, M. MILLARD, L. SEIDMAN, and B. BAYLISS
The Seismo-Lineament Analysis Method (SLAM): A Reconnaissance Tool to Help Find Seismogenic Faults
Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 199 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Tan and D. Helmberger
A New Method for Determining Small Earthquake Source Parameters Using Short-Period P Waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1176 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. Hardebeck
Homogeneity of Small-Scale Earthquake Faulting, Stress, and Fault Strength
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1675 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Kilb and J. L. Hardebeck
Fault Parameter Constraints Using Relocated Earthquakes: A Validation of First-Motion Focal-Mechanism Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1140 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.