Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2003; v. 93; no. 5; p. 2056-2068; DOI: 10.1785/0120020245
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilanova, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Fonseca, J. F. B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Lisbon 1755: A Case of Triggered Onshore Rupture?

Susana P. Vilanova, Catarina F. Nunes and Joao F. B. D. Fonseca

Division of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology
ICIST, Instituto Superior Tecnico
Av. Rovisco Pais, 1
1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
fonseca{at}alfa.ist.utl.pt

It has been widely recognized, both in classical and in modern studies, that the Lisbon earthquake of 1755 was a multiple event, composed of three shocks separated by a few minutes (see, e.g., Reid, 1914). Attempts to constrain the location of the source have led to a diversity of proposals, reflecting apparent contradictions in the data. The tsunami and damage along the south and southwest Iberian coast and in Morocco favor an offshore source, whereas the presence of an additional zone of strong shaking in the Lower Tagus Valley (LTV), near Lisbon, favors a more northerly location. By combining the contemporary accounts with intensity data from other earthquakes, we favor a compound source with a large distance between the faults. We propose that, although the mainshock was offshore, the resulting stress changes induced the rupture of the LTV fault, at a distance on the order of 350 km (but subject to large uncertainty in the offshore location), a few minutes after the mainshock. We favor this model, rather than site effects causing high intensities in the Lisbon area, because the highest intensities show a negative correlation to soft soil. Several other phenomena described in the eyewitness accounts can also be explained by the local rupture now proposed, such as a tsunamilike wave in the Tagus River, ground deformation affecting the course of the Tagus River, and the spatial pattern of damaging aftershocks. Recognition of this "missing" episode of rupture on the LTV fault significantly changes the hazard estimate for the Lisbon area.


Related articles in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America:

Comment on "Lisbon 1755: A Case of Triggered Onshore Rupture?" by Susana P. Vilanova, Catarina F. Nunes, and Joao F. B. D. Fonseca
L. Matias, A. Ribeiro, M. A. Baptista, N. Zitellini, J. Cabral, P. Terrinha, P. Teves-Costa, and J. M. Miranda
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005 95: 2534-2538. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Reply to "Comment on ‘Lisbon 1755: A Case of Triggered Onshore Rupture?’ by Susana P. Vilanova, Catarina F. Nunes, and Joao F. B. D. Fonseca," by L. Matias, A. Ribeiro, M. A. Baptista, N. Zitellini, J. Cabral, P. Terrinha, P. Teves-Costa, and J. M. Miranda
Joao F. B. D. Fonseca and Susana P. Vilanova
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005 95: 2539-2542. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. P. Vilanova and J. F. B. D. Fonseca
Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Assessment for Portugal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1702 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The HoloceneHome page
M. L. Clarke, M. L. Clarke, and H. M. Rendell
Effects of storminess, sand supply and the North Atlantic Oscillation on sand invasion and coastal dune accretion in western Portugal
The Holocene, April 1, 2006; 16(3): 341 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. Matias, A. Ribeiro, M. A. Baptista, N. Zitellini, J. Cabral, P. Terrinha, P. Teves-Costa, and J. M. Miranda
Comment on "Lisbon 1755: A Case of Triggered Onshore Rupture?" by Susana P. Vilanova, Catarina F. Nunes, and Joao F. B. D. Fonseca
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2534 - 2538.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. F. B. D. Fonseca and S. P. Vilanova
Reply to "Comment on 'Lisbon 1755: A Case of Triggered Onshore Rupture?' by Susana P. Vilanova, Catarina F. Nunes, and Joao F. B. D. Fonseca," by L. Matias, A. Ribeiro, M. A. Baptista, N. Zitellini, J. Cabral, P. Terrinha, P. Teves-Costa, and J. M. Miranda
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2539 - 2542.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Aftershocks and Triggered Events of the Great 1906 California Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2160 - 2186.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.