Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 2003; v. 93; no. 5; p. 1994-2004; DOI: 10.1785/0120020186
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchi, W.
Right arrow Articles by Boschi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

On the Validation of Earthquake-Forecasting Models: The Case of Pattern Recognition Algorithms

Warner Marzocchi, Laura Sandri and Enzo Boschi

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica Vulcanologia
Dipartimento di Fisica
Settore Geofisica
Università di Bologna
40127 Bologna, Italy

Earthquake forecasting is one of the geophysical issues with a potentially large social and political impact. Besides the purely scientific interest, the loss of lives and the huge damage caused by seismic events in many regions of the world have led many research groups to work in this field. Until now, however, the results obtained have not been convincing and they often have been a matter of intense debates. In part, these debates are due to the ambiguous definition of key concepts, such as precursor and forecast/prediction, as well as to the lack of a clear strategy to set up and check an earthquake-forecasting model. In this article, we provide insights that might contribute to better formally defining the earthquake-forecasting problem, both in setting up and in testing the validity of the forecasting model. As an illustration, we have applied these insights to forecasting models M8 and CN based on a pattern recognition approach. We found that the forecasting capability of these algorithms is very likely significantly overestimated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
D. Schorlemmer and M. C. Gerstenberger
RELM Testing Center
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 30 - 36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Pace, L. Peruzza, G. Lavecchia, and P. Boncio
Layered Seismogenic Source Model and Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses in Central Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 107 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.