HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Korneev, V. A. Articles by McEvilly, T. V. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Seismological Studies at Parkfield IX: Fault-Zone Imaging Using Guided Wave Attenuation

Center for Computational Seismology
Earth Sciences Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, California 94720
(V.A.K.)
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
University of California
Berkeley, California 94720
(R.M.N., T.V.M.)

Manuscript received 23 April 2002.

Numerical modeling studies and a growing number of observations have argued for the propagation of fault-zone guided waves (FZGWs) within a San Andreas Fault (SAF) zone that is 100-200 m wide at seismogenic depths and with 20%-40% lower shear-wave velocity than the adjacent unfaulted rock. Thousands of microearthquakes have been recorded since 1987 by the borehole High-Resolution Seismic Network at Parkfield, California, and they provide a comprehensive data set for characterizing wave propagation in the SAF zone. Using microearthquakes we confirm that FZGWs at Parkfield are generated within the fault zone (FZ) and that they are most prominent late in the coda of S. Numerical waveform modeling and guided-wave amplitude tomographic inversion show clearly that FZGWs are significantly less attenuated in a well-defined region of the FZ. This region plunges to the northwest along the northwest boundary of the region of highest moment release and separates locked and slipping sections of the SAF at depth, as determined independently from geodesy, seismicity, and the recurrence rates of characteristically repeating microearthquakes. We interpret this localized zone of strong FZGW propagation to be the northwest edge of the M 6 asperity at Parkfield. The mechanism for low FZGW attenuation in the zone is possibly due to dewatering by fracture closure and/or fault-normal compression or changes in fracture orientation due to a complex stress or strain field at the boundary between creeping and locked zones of the SAF.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Mizuno, Y. Kuwahara, H. Ito, and K. Nishigami Spatial Variations in Fault-Zone Structure along the Nojima Fault, Central Japan, as Inferred from Borehole Observations of Fault-Zone Trapped Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 558 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Johnson and R. M. Nadeau Asperity Model of an Earthquake: Dynamic Problem Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 75 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]