Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2003; v. 93; no. 3; p. 1390-1394; DOI: 10.1785/0120020194
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cramer, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

2001 Bhuj, India, Earthquake Engineering Seismoscope Recordings and Eastern North America Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations

Chris H. Cramer and Ashok Kumar

U.S. Geological Survey
3876 Central Ave., Suite 2
Memphis, Tennessee 38152-3050
cramer{at}ceri.memphis.edu
(C.H.C.)

Department of Earthquake Engineering
India Institute of Technology
Roorkee, India
akmeqfeq{at}iitr.ernet.in
(A.K.)

Engineering seismoscope data collected at distances less than 300 km for the M 7.7 Bhuj, India, mainshock are compatible with ground-motion attenuation in eastern North America (ENA). The mainshock ground-motion data have been corrected to a common geological site condition using the factors of Joyner and Boore (2000) and a classification scheme of Quaternary or Tertiary sediments or rock. We then compare these data to ENA ground-motion attenuation relations. Despite uncertainties in recording method, geological site corrections, common tectonic setting, and the amount of regional seismic attenuation, the corrected Bhuj dataset agrees with the collective predictions by ENA ground-motion attenuation relations within a factor of 2. This level of agreement is within the dataset uncertainties and the normal variance for recorded earthquake ground motions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. Jaiswal and R. Sinha
Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation for Peninsular India
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 318 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore
Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Ground-Motion Scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, Deduced from Aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1658 - 1669.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.