|
|
||||||||
Short Note |
U.S. Geological Survey
3876 Central Ave., Suite
2
Memphis, Tennessee
38152-3050
cramer{at}ceri.memphis.edu
(C.H.C.)
Department of Earthquake Engineering
India Institute of
Technology
Roorkee,
India
akmeqfeq{at}iitr.ernet.in
(A.K.)
Engineering seismoscope data collected at distances less than 300 km for the M 7.7 Bhuj, India, mainshock are compatible with ground-motion attenuation in eastern North America (ENA). The mainshock ground-motion data have been corrected to a common geological site condition using the factors of Joyner and Boore (2000) and a classification scheme of Quaternary or Tertiary sediments or rock. We then compare these data to ENA ground-motion attenuation relations. Despite uncertainties in recording method, geological site corrections, common tectonic setting, and the amount of regional seismic attenuation, the corrected Bhuj dataset agrees with the collective predictions by ENA ground-motion attenuation relations within a factor of 2. This level of agreement is within the dataset uncertainties and the normal variance for recorded earthquake ground motions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Jaiswal and R. Sinha Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Estimation for Peninsular India Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 318 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Atkinson and D. M. Boore Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2181 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Ground-Motion Scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, Deduced from Aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1658 - 1669. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |