HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Beeler, N. M. Articles by Hickman, S. H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On the Expected Relationships among Apparent Stress, Static Stress Drop, Effective Shear Fracture Energy, and Efficiency

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977
345 Middlefield Rd.
Menlo Park, California 94025
(N.M.B., S.H.H.)

Dept. of Geosciences
ESS Building
State University of New York Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-2100
(T.-F.W.)

We consider expected relationships between apparent stress _a and static stress drop _s using a standard energy balance and find _a = _s(0.5 – ), where is stress overshoot. A simple implementation of this balance is to assume overshoot is constant; then apparent stress should vary linearly with stress drop, consistent with spectral theories (Brune, 1970) and dynamic crack models (Madariaga, 1976). Normalizing this expression by the static stress drop defines an efficiency _sw = _a/_s as follows from Savage and Wood (1971). We use this measure of efficiency to analyze data from one of a number of observational studies that find apparent stress to increase with seismic moment, namely earthquakes recorded in the Cajon Pass borehole by Abercrombie (1995). Increases in apparent stress with event size could reflect an increase in seismic efficiency; however, _sw for the Cajon earthquakes shows no such increase and is approximately constant over the entire moment range. Thus, apparent stress and stress drop co-vary, as expected from the energy balance at constant overshoot. The median value of _sw for the Cajon earthquakes is four times lower than _sw for laboratory events. Thus, these Cajon-recorded earthquakes have relatively low and approximately constant efficiency. As the energy balance requires _sw = 0.5 – , overshoot can be estimated directly from the Savage–Wood efficiency; overshoot is positive for Cajon Pass earthquakes. Variations in apparent stress with seismic moment for these earthquakes result primarily from systematic variations in static stress drop with seismic moment and do not require a relative decrease in sliding resistance with increasing event size (dynamic weakening). Based on the comparison of field and lab determinations of the Savage–Wood efficiency, we suggest the criterion _sw > 0.3 as a test for dynamic weakening in excess of that seen in the lab.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Kohrs-Sansorny, F. Courboulex, M. Bour, and A. Deschamps A Two-Stage Method for Ground-Motion Simulation Using Stochastic Summation of Small Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1387 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Oye, H. Bungum, and M. Roth Source Parameters and Scaling Relations for Mining-Related Seismicity within the Pyhasalmi Ore Mine, Finland Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 1011 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kanamori and L. Rivera Static and Dynamic Scaling Relations for Earthquakes and Their Implications for Rupture Speed and Stress Drop Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 314 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]