Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2003; v. 93; no. 3; p. 1370-1380; DOI: 10.1785/0120020149
© 2003 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widmer-Schnidrig, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

What Can Superconducting Gravimeters Contribute to Normal-Mode Seismology?

R. Widmer-Schnidrig

Black Forest Observatory
Institute of Geophysics
Stuttgart University
Heubach 206
D-77709 Wolfach, Germany
widmer{at}geophys.uni-stuttgart.de
(R.W.-S.)

The seismic free oscillations of the Earth can be observed in the frequency band from 0.3 to 20 mHz, and estimates of their frequencies constitute the principal constraints for spherically symmetric Earth models such as the Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM). While the bulk of the mode observations rely on recordings of the spring gravimeters deployed in the International Deployment of Accelerometers (IDA) network and more recently on the Streckiesen STS-1 seismometers deployed in the global seismic network (GSN), we show here that the most recent generation of superconducting gravimeters (SGs) can achieve lower noise levels than either one of the aforementioned sensors at frequencies lower than ~0.8 mHz.

While the splitting of modes above 1 mHz is largely due to structural heterogeneities in P- and S-wave velocities, the modes below 1 mHz are unique for two reasons: (1) the destabilizing effect of self-gravitation leads to a high sensitivity to density heterogeneities and (2) the vicinity of these modes to the frequency of the Earth's rotation leads to pronounced Zeeman splitting, which in turn depends on spherically averaged density structure. Thus it is argued that SGs can make a significant contribution to the illumination of long-wavelength density heterogeneities in the Earth's mantle.

At frequencies above 1 mHz, current SGs exhibit higher noise levels than the quietest seismometers deployed in the GSN. Furthermore we show that above 3 mHz, even the Streckeisen STS-2 seismometers compare favorably against the SGs if the former are installed with elaborate shielding from environmental effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Seismological Research LettersHome page
M. Van Camp, J. Steim, G. Rapagnani, and L. Rivera
Connecting a Quanterra Data Logger Q330 on the GWR C021 Superconducting Gravimeter
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2008; 79(6): 785 - 796.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Seismological Research LettersHome page
Y. Xu, D. Crossley, and R. B. Herrmann
Amplitude and Q of 0S0 from the Sumatra Earthquake as Recorded on Superconducting Gravimeters and Seismometers
Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2008; 79(6): 797 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. Sleeman, A. van Wettum, and J. Trampert
Three-Channel Correlation Analysis: A New Technique to Measure Instrumental Noise of Digitizers and Seismic Sensors
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 258 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Seismological Society of America.