|
|
||||||||
Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental
Engineering
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
212
Ketter Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260-4300
(G.P.M., A.S.P.)
A simple, yet effective, analytical model is proposed for the representation of near-field strong ground motions. The model adequately describes the impulsive character of near-fault ground motions both qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition, it can be used to analytically reproduce empirical observations that are based on available near-source records. The input parameters of the model have an unambiguous physical meaning. The proposed analytical model has been calibrated using a large number of actual near-field ground-motion records. It successfully simulates the entire set of available near-fault displacement, velocity, and (in many cases) acceleration time histories, as well as the corresponding deformation, velocity, and acceleration response spectra. Furthermore, a very simplified methodology for generating realistic synthetic ground motions that are adequate for engineering analysis and design is outlined and applied. Finally, it should be noted that the analytical model (along with the scaling laws of its parameters) proposed in the present work has the potential to facilitate the study of the elastic and inelastic response of conventional, nonconventional (e.g., base-isolated), and special structures (e.g., suspension bridges, fluid-storage tanks) subjected to near-source seismic excitations as a function of the model input parameters and thus, ultimately, as a function of earthquake size.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou Effect of Fault Rupture Characteristics on Near-Fault Strong Ground Motions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 37 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Anderson, I. Tibuleac, A. Anooshehpoor, G. Biasi, K. Smith, and D. von Seggern Exceptional Ground Motions Recorded during the 26 April 2008 Mw 5.0 Earthquake in Mogul, Nevada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2009; 99(6): 3475 - 3486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. O. Strasser and J. J. Bommer Review: Strong Ground Motions--Have We Seen the Worst? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2009; 99(5): 2613 - 2637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Jalali and M. D. Trifunac Response Spectra for Near-Source, Differential, and Rotational Strong Ground Motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1404 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Frankel A Constant Stress-Drop Model for Producing Broadband Synthetic Seismograms: Comparison with the Next Generation Attenuation Relations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2009; 99(2A): 664 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Mavroeidis, B. Zhang, G. Dong, A. S. Papageorgiou, U. Dutta, and N. N. Biswas Estimation of Strong Ground Motion from the Great 1964 Mw 9.2 Prince William Sound, Alaska, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2303 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Baker Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1486 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Halldorsson and A. S. Papageorgiou Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1276 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Motazedian and G. M. Atkinson Stochastic Finite-Fault Modeling Based on a Dynamic Corner Frequency Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 995 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |