HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olsen, K. B. Articles by Bradley, C. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Estimation of Q for Long-Period (>2 sec) Waves in the Los Angeles Basin

Institute for Crustal Studies
University of California at Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, California 93016-1100
(K.B.O.)

Department of Geological Sciences
San Diego State University
San Diego, California 92182
(S.M.D.)

Los Alamos National Laboratory
EES-5, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
(C.R.B.)

We simulate 0- to 0.5-Hz 3D wave propagation through the Southern California Earthquake Center seismic velocity reference model, version 2, for the 1994 Northridge earthquake in order to examine the effects of anelastic attenuation and amplification within the near-surface sediments. We use a fourth-order finite-difference staggered-grid method with the coarse-grained frequency-independent anelastic scheme of Day and Bradley (2001) and a variable slip distribution from kinematic inversion for the Northridge earthquake. We find that the near-surface material with S-wave velocity (V_s) as low as 500 m/sec significantly affects the long-period peak ground velocities, compared with simulations in which the S-wave velocity is constrained to 1 km/sec and greater. Anelastic attenuation also has a strong effect on ground-motion amplitudes, reducing the predicted peak velocity by a factor of up to 2.5, relative to lossless simulations. Our preferred Q model is Q_s/V_s = 0.02 (V_s in meters per second) for V_s less than 1–2 km/sec, and much larger Q_s/V_s (0.1, V_s in meters per second) for layers with higher velocities. The simple model reduces the standard deviation of the residuals between synthetic and observed natural log of peak velocity from 1.13 to 0.26, relative to simulations for the lossless case. The anelastic losses have their largest effect on short-period surface waves propagating in the Los Angeles basin, which are principally sensitive to Q_s in the low-velocity, near-surface sediments of the basin. The low-frequency ground motion simulated here is relatively insensitive to Q_p, as well as to the values of Q_s at depths greater than roughly that of the 2-km/sec S-wave velocity isosurface.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Olsen, S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, D. Okaya, P. Maechling, and T. Jordan TeraShake2: Spontaneous Rupture Simulations of Mw 7.7 Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1162 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, and P. Liu Simulated Ground Motion in Santa Clara Valley, California, and Vicinity from M>=6.7 Scenario Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1243 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Brocher Compressional and Shear-Wave Velocity versus Depth Relations for Common Rock Types in Northern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 950 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Aagaard, T. M. Brocher, D. Dolenc, D. Dreger, R. W. Graves, S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, S. Larsen, and M. L. Zoback Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part I: Validation Using the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 989 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Askan, V. Akcelik, J. Bielak, and O. Ghattas Full Waveform Inversion for Seismic Velocity and Anelastic Losses in Heterogeneous Structures Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2007; 97(6): 1990 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Chen, L. Zhao, and T. H. Jordan Full 3D Tomography for the Crustal Structure of the Los Angeles Region Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1094 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Yamada and M. Horike Inference of Q-Values below 1 Hz from Borehole and Surface Data in the Osaka Basin by Three-Component Waveform Fitting Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1267 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, R. A. Williams, D. Carver, A. Frankel, G. Choy, P.-C. Liu, R. C. Jachens, T. M. Brocher, and C. M. Wentworth Modeling and Validation of a 3D Velocity Structure for the Santa Clara Valley, California, for Seismic-Wave Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1851 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Satoh Inversion of QS of Deep Sediments from Surface-to-Borehole Spectral Ratios Considering Obliquely Incident SH and SV Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 943 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Pratt and T. M. Brocher Site Response and Attenuation in the Puget Lowland, Washington State Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 536 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Li, W. S. D. Wilcock, T. L. Pratt, C. M. Snelson, and T. M. Brocher Seismic Attenuation Structure of the Seattle Basin, Washington State, from Explosive-Source Refraction Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 553 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Olsen, A. Akinci, A. Rovelli, F. Marra, and L. Malagnini 3D Ground-Motion Estimation in Rome, Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Brocher A Regional View of Urban Sedimentary Basins in Northern California Based on Oil Industry Compressional-Wave Velocity and Density Logs Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2093 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Benites and K. B. Olsen Modeling Strong Ground Motion in the Wellington Metropolitan Area, New Zealand Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2180 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. Oglesby, D. S. Dreger, R. A. Harris, N. Ratchkovski, and R. Hansen Inverse Kinematic and Forward Dynamic Models of the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S214 - S233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Komatitsch, Q. Liu, J. Tromp, P. Suss, C. Stidham, and J. H. Shaw Simulations of Ground Motion in the Los Angeles Basin Based upon the Spectral-Element Method Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 187 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]