Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2002; v. 92; no. 6; p. 2391-2399; DOI: 10.1785/0120010218
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Application of Regularized Discrimination Analysis to Regional Seismic Event Identification

Dale N. Anderson and Steven R. Taylor

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
902 Battelle Boulevard
P.O. Box 999
Richland, Washington 99352
(D.N.A.)

Los Alamos National Laboratory
P.O. Box 1663
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
(S.R.T)

We present multivariate seismic event identification methods that can be applied to a large number of highly correlated regional discriminants. The methods employ the ridge discrimination techniques first proposed by Smidt and McDonald (1976). Ridge discrimination was developed to address the problems associated with discrimination in high-dimension, colinear settings and is readily adaptable to linear, quadratic, and outlier identification rules. Ridge discrimination is a special case of regularized discrimination analysis (RDA) developed by Friedman (1989). RDA includes linear discrimination (LDA), quadratic discrimination (QDA), and Euclidean distance–based nearest mean discrimination in its parameterization. We propose a new approach to the optimal selection of RDA parameters. We show that the techniques presented in this article can be used to transition from an outlier analysis approach to seismic identification to classical discrimination, as quality explosion calibration data are collected. We demonstrate the importance of including the correlation structure between seismic measurements in event identification. Not including this correlation structure in any identification framework can aggravate identification errors and give an erroneous impression of capability. With the techniques presented, a large number of discriminants can be used and no a priori subselection of discriminants is necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. N. Anderson, D. K. Fagan, M. A. Tinker, G. D. Kraft, and K. D. Hutchenson
A Mathematical Statistics Formulation of the Teleseismic Explosion Identification Problem with Multiple Discriminants
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1730 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. R. Taylor and H. J. Patton
A Probability of Detection Method for Reducing Short-Period mb-Ms False Alarm Rates
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1078 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.