Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2002; v. 92; no. 6; p. 2264-2276; DOI: 10.1785/0120010200
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardebeck, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shearer, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

A New Method for Determining First-Motion Focal Mechanisms

Jeanne L. Hardebeck and Peter M. Shearer

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California 92093-0225
jeanne{at}igpp.ucsd.edu
(J.L.H., P.M.S.)

We introduce a new method for determining earthquake focal mechanisms from P-wave first-motion polarities. Our technique differs from previous methods in that it accounts for possible errors in the assumed earthquake location and seismic-velocity model, as well as in the polarity observations. The set of acceptable focal mechanisms, allowing for the expected errors in polarities and takeoff angles, is found for each event. Multiple trials are performed with different source locations and velocity models, and mechanisms with up to a specified fraction of misfit polarities are included in the set of acceptable mechanisms. The average of the set is returned as the preferred mechanism, and the uncertainty is represented by the distribution of acceptable mechanisms. The solution is considered adequately stable only if the set of acceptable mechanisms is tightly clustered around the preferred mechanism. We validate the method by demonstrating that the well-constrained mechanisms found for clusters of closely spaced events with similar waveforms are indeed very similar. Tests on noisy synthetic data, which mimic the event and station coverage of real data, show that the method accurately recovers the mechanisms and that the uncertainty estimates are reasonable. We also investigate the sensitivity of focal mechanisms to changes in polarities, event depth, and seismic-velocity model, and we find that mechanisms are most sensitive to changes in the vertical velocity gradient.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Tan and D. Helmberger
A New Method for Determining Small Earthquake Source Parameters Using Short-Period P Waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1176 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. Hardebeck, A. J. Michael, and T. M. Brocher
Seismic Velocity Structure and Seismotectonics of the Eastern San Francisco Bay Region, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 826 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
K. L. Pankow, J. C. Pechmann, and W. J. Arabasz
Use of ANSS Strong-Motion Data to Analyze Small Local Earthquakes
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2007; 78(3): 369 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. M. Veilleux and D. I. Doser
Studies of Wadati-Benioff Zone Seismicity of the Anchorage, Alaska, Region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2007; 97(1B): 52 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. L. Hardebeck
Homogeneity of Small-Scale Earthquake Faulting, Stress, and Fault Strength
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1675 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. Zhao, P. Chen, and T. H. Jordan
Strain Green's Tensors, Reciprocity, and Their Applications to Seismic Source and Structure Studies
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1753 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. Thurber, H. Zhang, F. Waldhauser, J. Hardebeck, A. Michael, and D. Eberhart-Phillips
Three-Dimensional Compressional Wavespeed Model, Earthquake Relocations, and Focal Mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, Region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S38 - S49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Kilb and J. L. Hardebeck
Fault Parameter Constraints Using Relocated Earthquakes: A Validation of First-Motion Focal-Mechanism Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1140 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Using S/P Amplitude Ratios to Constrain the Focal Mechanisms of Small Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2434 - 2444.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.