Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 2002; v. 92; no. 6; p. 2177-2185; DOI: 10.1785/0120010295
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montilla, J. A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Deaggregation in Magnitude, Distance, and Azimuth in the South and West of the Iberian Peninsula

José A. Peláez Montilla, Carlos López Casado and Jesús Henares Romero

Departamento de Física
University of Jaén
C/Virgen de la Cabeza, 2
23071 Jaén, Spain
(J.A.P.M.)

Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos
University of Granada
Avda. Severo Ochoa, s/n
18071 Granada, Spain
(C.L.C., J.H.R.)

We present the results of the seismic deaggregation in 15 of the most important cities with the greatest seismic hazard in the south and west of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal). The deaggregation was carried out based on the calculation of the seismic hazard in the zone, taking into account the peak horizontal acceleration with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years (return period of 475 years).

We first performed a deaggregation study in terms of magnitude and distance in order to subsequently carry it out in azimuth. The aim of both studies is to determine the relative contribution of the different seismic foci and sources to the seismic hazard in a given location. Due to the lack of enough seismotectonic data in the study region, we could not obtain information about the contribution of specific active faults and we have not been able to include a characteristic earthquake model. However, by starting from a calculated hazard using smoothed background seismicity, it is possible to determine the contribution of the different seismic foci of the region to the seismic hazard at each location.

The results reveal that there are cities where the hazard is entirely, or almost entirely, due to the local seismicity (e.g., in Portugal: Lisbon, 87%; Coimbra, 82%; in Spain: Almería, 99%; Córdoba, 99%; Granada, 99%). We have also determined that there are cities where seismic foci at 200 km away or more can be the most important or at least contribute significantly to the hazard (e.g., Beja and Faro in Portugal and Cádiz and Huelva in Spain).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Use of Active Fault Data versus Seismicity Data in the Evaluation of Seismic Hazard in the Granada Basin (Southern Spain)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1670 - 1678.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.