Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2002; v. 92; no. 5; p. 1841-1846; DOI: 10.1785/0120010148
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bakun, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

A Bilinear Source-Scaling Model for M-log A Observations of Continental Earthquakes

Thomas C. Hanks and William H. Bakun

Robert E. Wallace Earthquake Center
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
thanks{at}usgs.gov

Manuscript received 15 April 2001.

The Wells and Coppersmith (1994) M-log A data set for continental earthquakes (where M is moment magnitude and A is fault area) and the regression lines derived from it are widely used in seismic hazard analysis for estimating M, given A. Their relations are well determined, whether for the full data set of all mechanism types or for the subset of strike-slip earthquakes. Because the coefficient of the log A term is essentially 1 in both their relations, they are equivalent to constant stress-drop scaling, at least for M ≤ 7, where most of the data lie. For M > 7, however, both relations increasingly underestimate the observations with increasing M. This feature, at least for strike-slip earthquakes, is strongly suggestive of L-model scaling at large M. Using constant stress-drop scaling ({Delta}{sigma} = 26.7 bars) for M ≤ 6.63 and L-model scaling (average fault slip u = {alpha}L, where L is fault length and {alpha} = 2.19 &times 10-5) at larger M, we obtain the relations

and

These prediction equations of our bilinear model fit the Wells and Coppersmith (1994) data set well in their respective ranges of validity, the transition magnitude corresponding to A = 537 km2 being M = 6.71.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. E. Shaw and S. G. Wesnousky
Slip-Length Scaling in Large Earthquakes: The Role of Deep-Penetrating Slip below the Seismogenic Layer
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1633 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. A. Dalguer, H. Miyake, S. M. Day, and K. Irikura
Surface Rupturing and Buried Dynamic-Rupture Models Calibrated with Statistical Observations of Past Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1147 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. C. Hanks and W. H. Bakun
M-logA Observations for Recent Large Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 490 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field
A Summary of Previous Working Groups on California Earthquake Probabilities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1033 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. B. Willis, P. J. Haeussler, R. L. Bruhn, and G. C. Willis
Holocene Slip Rate for the Western Segment of the Castle Mountain Fault, Alaska
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 1019 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. H. Bakun
MMI Attenuation and Historical Earthquakes in the Basin and Range Province of Western North America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2206 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. D. Fisk
Source Spectral Modeling of Regional P/S Discriminants at Nuclear Test Sites in China and the Former Soviet Union
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2348 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. Cao, M. D. Petersen, and A. D. Frankel
Model Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2040 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. Asano, T. Iwata, and K. Irikura
Estimation of Source Rupture Process and Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the 2002 Denali, Alaska, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1701 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Relations Between Earthquake Magnitude and Fault Rupture Dimensions: How Regionally Variable Are They?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2004; 94(3): 776 - 788.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.