Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; May 2002; v. 92; no. 4; p. 1513-1524; DOI: 10.1785/0120000919
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karakelian, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser-Smith, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Analysis of Ultralow-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Measurements Associated with the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Sequence

Darcy Karakelian, Gregory C. Beroza, Simon L. Klemperer and Antony C. Fraser-Smith

Department of Geophysics
Stanford University
Stanford, California 94305-2215
darcy{at}pangea.stanford.edu.

We installed two electromagnetic (EM) monitoring systems in the immediate aftermath of the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine earthquake to search for possible continuing ultralow-frequency (ULF) EM activity due to the mainshock as well as for any precursory or coseismic EM signals that might be associated with large aftershocks. We installed the first portable monitoring system 2.5 days after the M 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake at a location 16 km southeast of the epicenter and 2 km east of the surface rupture. A second system was installed on 29 October 1999, 10 km northwest of the epicenter and within 100 m of the surface rupture. Our continuous measurements of multiple-component magnetic field, electric field, and ground motion span the low frequencies appropriate for recording possible EM signals generated at seismogenic depths and were carried out during 3 months following the mainshock. Continuous magnetic-field measurements at observatory EM stations operating in California are used as remote-reference sites to remove global atmospheric signals, which helps isolate local terrestrial sources of interest. Our analysis of preseismic ULF-EM variations, the coseismic response, the 2-month-long magnetic-field power spectra, and electric-field polarization shows no anomalous behavior clearly associated with seismic activity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. J. S. Johnston, Y. Sasai, G. D. Egbert, and R. J. Mueller
Seismomagnetic Effects from the Long-Awaited 28 September 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S206 - S220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.