|
|
||||||||
Article |
California Institute of Technology, Seismological
Laboratory
Mail Code 252-21
1200 E. California Blvd.
Pasadena,
California 91125
(E.H., K.H.)
U.S. Geological Survey
535 S. Wilson Ave.
Pasadena,
California 91106
(L.M.J.)
The 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine mainshock showed
right-lateral strike-slip faulting, with an initial strike of N6°W and
vertical dip. The mainshock was preceded within 20 hours by 18 recorded
foreshocks of 1.5
M
3.8 within a few kilometers distance of
the mainshock hypocenter. The aftershocks delineate how the Hector Mine
earthquake ruptured with strike N6°W to the south for a distance of 15 km,
and possibly to the north for a distance of several kilometers. The two
largest aftershocks of M 5.9 and M 5.7 occurred near the
north and south ends of the first mainshock rupture segment. The second
segment of rupture, starting 15 km to the south away from the mainshock
hypocenter, delineated by strike-slip and thrust-faulting aftershocks, extends
10 km farther away with a strike of S140°E along the Bullion fault. The
aftershocks also outline an unusual third rupture segment, extending from
about 5 km south of the hypocenter with a strike of N30°W to N35°W for
a distance of 20 km. Approximately 10 to 25 km farther to the north and west
of the mainshock epicenter, several clusters form a complex aftershock
distribution. Three-dimensional Vp and Vp/Vs models of the region exhibit only
small regional changes, as is typical for the Mojave region. Nonetheless, the
mainshock rupture started within a region of rapidly varying Vp, and at least
three regions of low Vp/Vs are imaged within the aftershock zone. The rate of
decay for the Hector Mine earthquake sequence has been slightly above the mean
for both p-values and b-values in southern California. The
focal mechanisms of the aftershocks and the state of stress are consistent
with strike-slip faulting, including a component of normal faulting most
prominent to the north. The orientation of the regional maximum horizontal
stress, the variation in orientation of the mainshock fault segments by
30°, and scattered distribution of aftershocks suggest that the mainshock
and aftershock deformation field exhibit volumetric shear deformation
accommodated by complex conjugate sets of strike-slip faults.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. C. Hanks and W. H. Bakun M-logA Observations for Recent Large Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 490 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Madden, C. M. Rubin, and A. Streig Holocene and Latest Pleistocene Activity on the Mesquite Lake Fault near Twentynine Palms, Eastern California Shear Zone: Implications for Fault Interaction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2006; 96(4A): 1305 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Maerten, P. Resor, D. Pollard, and L. Maerten Inverting for Slip on Three-Dimensional Fault Surfaces Using Angular Dislocations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1654 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Salichon, P. Lundgren, B. Delouis, and D. Giardini Slip History of the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake (California) from the Inversion of InSAR, GPS, and Teleseismic Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2015 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Graves and D. J. Wald Observed and Simulated Ground Motions in the San Bernardino Basin Region for the Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 131 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake: The Dynamics of a Branched Fault System Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2459 - 2476. |
||||
![]() |
Stress Heterogeneity in the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field, Baja California, Mexico Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 783 - 794. |
||||
![]() |
The Hector Mine, California, Earthquake of 16 October 1999: Introduction to the Special Issue Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1147 - 1153. |
||||
![]() |
Primary Surface Rupture Associated with the Mw 7.1 16 October 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake, San Bernardino County, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1171 - 1191. |
||||
![]() |
Source Description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Part I: Wavelet Domain Inversion Theory and Resolution Analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1192 - 1207. |
||||
![]() |
Source Description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Part II: Complexity of Slip History Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1208 - 1226. |
||||
![]() |
Properties of the Aftershock Sequence of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake: Implications for Aftershock Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1227 - 1240. |
||||
![]() |
Radiated Energy from the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake: Regional and Teleseismic Estimates Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1256 - 1265. |
||||
![]() |
The Combined Inversion of Seismic and Geodetic Data for the Source Process of the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1266 - 1280. |
||||
![]() |
Study of the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake Fault Plane by Trapped Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1318 - 1332. |
||||
![]() |
Faulting and Effects of Associated Shaking at Pisgah Crater Volcano Caused by the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake (Mw 7.1), Central Mojave Desert, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1333 - 1340. |
||||
![]() |
Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1377 - 1389. |
||||
![]() |
Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1390 - 1402. |
||||
![]() |
Continuous GPS Observations of Postseismic Deformation Following the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake (Mw 7.1) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1403 - 1422. |
||||
![]() |
Early Postseismic Deformation from the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Measured by Survey-Mode GPS Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1423 - 1432. |
||||
![]() |
The 1999 (Mw 7.1) Hector Mine, California, Earthquake: Near-Field Postseismic Deformation from ERS Interferometry Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1433 - 1442. |
||||
![]() |
The 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake: A Test of the Stress Shadow Hypothesis? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1497 - 1512. |
||||
![]() |
TriNet Strong-Motion Data from the M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake of 16 October 1999 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1525 - 1542. |
||||
![]() |
Geologic and Paleoseismic Study of the Lavic Lake Fault at Lavic Lake Playa, Mojave Desert, Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1577 - 1591. |
||||
![]() |
Relationship of the 1999 Hector Mine and 1992 Landers Fault Ruptures to Offsets on Neogene Faults and Distribution of Late Cenozoic Basins in the Eastern California Shear Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1592 - 1605. |
||||
![]() |
The Emerson Lake Body: A Link between the Landers and Hector Mine Earthquakes, Southern California, as Inferred from Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1606 - 1620. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |