Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2002; v. 92; no. 3; p. 962-982; DOI: 10.1785/0120010209
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, G.
Right arrow Articles by Papageorgiou, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Seismic Radiation from a Unidirectional Asymmetrical Circular Crack Model, Part II: Variable Rupture Velocity

Gang Dong and Apostolos S. Papageorgiou

Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering
State University of New York at Buffalo
212 Ketter Hall
Buffalo, New York 14260-4300

Manuscript received 24 July 2001.

The unidirectional asymmetrical circular crack model proposed by Dong and Papageorgiou (2002) in a companion article (referred to in this article as Part I) is further developed to account for variable rupture velocity using the analysis method proposed by Sato (1994). Special emphasis is placed on the properties of the radiated acceleration pulses emitted by a rapid but continuous change in rupture velocity. The mathematical expressions describing such pulses are valid even if only a segment of the rupture front (in the vicinity of the critical point/zone that is responsible for their emission) is coherent. Furthermore, they are valid also in the near field. All the conclusions reached by Sato (1994) for the symmetrical circular crack model, appropriately modified to account for azimuthal variation of directivity effects, are valid also for the unidirectional asymmetrical circular crack model. Specifically, the acceleration pulse exhibits a directivity with respect to both the pulse width and amplitude. The pulse width is, on average, given by the directivity factor, which depends on the rupture velocity averaged over the time interval during which the change of rupture velocity takes place. Furthermore, the directivity factor, as expected, demonstrates a strong azimuthal dependence with the strongest radiation channelled in the direction of crack growth. The pulse width radiated toward the growth direction of the rupture front is shorter than that radiated toward the opposite side. The spectral amplitude of the acceleration pulse depends linearly on the strain drop over the crack surface, the radius of curvature of the rupture front at which the rupture velocity starts to change, the magnitude of the change in rupture velocity, and the generalized radiation pattern coefficient. The directivity of the radiation pattern coefficient is stronger than that of the case of an abrupt change in rupture velocity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Halldorsson and A. S. Papageorgiou
Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1276 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou
A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1099 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Seismic Radiation from a Unidirectional Asymmetrical Circular Crack Model, Part I: Constant Rupture Velocity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 945 - 961.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.