Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2002; v. 92; no. 3; p. 1015-1024; DOI: 10.1785/0120010203
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Electronic Supplement
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Beresnev, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Ground Motions at Memphis and St. Louis from M 7.5-8.0 Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone

Gail M. Atkinson and Igor A. Beresnev

Dept. Earth Sciences
Carlton University
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
gma{at}ccs.carleton.ca
(G.M.A.)
Dept. Earth Sciences
Iowa State University
Ames, Iowa
beresnev{at}iastate.edu
(I.A.B.)

Manuscript received 20 July 2001.

The New Madrid seismic zone is the most important regional seismic hazard in middle America, having produced several very large earthquakes in historic and geologic time. In this study we simulate time histories in Memphis, Tennessee, and St. Louis, Missouri, for M 7.5 and M 8.0 earthquakes along two faults in the New Madrid seismic zone. Simulations are based on a well-established and calibrated finite-fault simulation program (FINSIM), which has been shown to reproduce ground motions for earthquakes of M 4-8 in eastern and western North America (Beresnev and Atkinson, 2001a). Simulations are made for representative soil profiles for each city, as well as for reference bedrock conditions (at the base of the soil profile); the effect of nonlinearity on soil amplification is considered for the soil sites. Uncertainty in the results is considered by modeling a wide range of alternative scenarios, representing the major uncertainties in input parameters. The total uncertainty in ground motions (response spectra) is about a factor of 2. Results are most sensitive to magnitude, hypocenter location (directivity effects), and maximum slip velocity. The resulting time histories and spectra for all modeled scenarios are available as an electronic supplement to this article.

Results are validated to the extent possible using the modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) observations from the 1811-1812 earthquakes. The simulated motions are consistent with MMI observations at St. Louis and Memphis. It is not possible to distinguish, based on the MMI observations, which of the M 7.5 or M 8.0 scenarios are most likely. However, we conclude that the most extreme scenarios, such as M 8.0 with high slip velocity or large directivity effects, are not likely because they would produce higher MMI values than those that were observed.

Online material: time histories and spectra for modeled scenarios.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. P. Mavroeidis, B. Zhang, G. Dong, A. S. Papageorgiou, U. Dutta, and N. N. Biswas
Estimation of Strong Ground Motion from the Great 1964 Mw 9.2 Prince William Sound, Alaska, Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2303 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Galluzzo, G. Zonno, and E. Del Pezzo
Stochastic Finite-Fault Ground-Motion Simulation in a Wave-Field Diffusive Regime: Case Study of the Mt. Vesuvius Volcanic Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1272 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. H. Cramer
Quantifying the Uncertainty in Site Amplification Modeling and Its Effects on Site-Specific Seismic-Hazard Estimation in the Upper Mississippi Embayment and Adjacent Areas
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2008 - 2020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. C. Eagar, G. L. Pavlis, and M. W. Hamburger
Evidence of Possible Induced Seismicity in the Wabash Valley Seismic Zone from Improved Microearthquake Locations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1718 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.