HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stirling, M. Articles by Berryman, K. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Comparison of Earthquake Scaling Relations Derived from Data of the Instrumental and Preinstrumental Era

Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd
P.O. Box 30368
Lower Hutt, New Zealand

Estimates of surface rupture displacement and magnitude for crustal earthquakes from the preinstrumental era (pre-1900) tend to be greater than the corresponding estimates derived from modern scaling relations. We investigate this tendency using an expanded and updated version of the earthquake dataset of Wells and Coppersmith (1994) to fit regression relations of moment magnitude on surface rupture length and rupture area and average surface displacement on surface rupture length. Separate relations are fitted to preinstrumental and instrumental data and the results compared to the equivalent relations of Wells and Coppersmith. We find that our relations for instrumental data remove some, but not all, of the differences between the preinstrumental data and the relations of Wells and Coppersmith. We attribute the remaining differences largely to natural censoring of surface displacements less than about 1 m and surface rupture lengths less than about 5 km from the dataset for the preinstrumental era because regressions constructed from similarly censored instrumental data are indistinguishable from the preinstrumental regressions. Since the regressions for our censored instrumental data (i.e., restricted to moderate to large earthquakes) are different from regressions for our complete dataset of instrumental earthquakes and from the regressions of Wells and Coppersmith (both with a larger proportion of small-to-moderate earthquakes), the results may indicate that large earthquakes have different scaling relationships from those of smaller earthquakes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Hough and K. Hutton Revisiting the 1872 Owens Valley, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 931 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Biasi and R. J. Weldon II Estimating Surface Rupture Length and Magnitude of Paleoearthquakes from Point Measurements of Rupture Displacement Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1612 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]