HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grant, L. B. Articles by Runnerstrom, E. E. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Coastal Uplift of the San Joaquin Hills, Southern Los Angeles Basin, California, by a Large Earthquake since A.D. 1635

Department of Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California–Irvine
Irvine, California 92697-7070
lgrant{at}uci.edu

Late Holocene marsh deposits and a shoreline along the coast of the San Joaquin Hills, southern Los Angeles basin, range from 1 to 3.6 m above the active shoreline. Radiocarbon dating of ancient marsh shows that emergence occurred after A.D. 1635. The age, distribution, and geomorphic expression of elevated marsh and shoreline are best explained by tectonic uplift due to a M >7 earthquake. Radiocarbon dates and the historic record of seismicity suggest the earthquake occurred between A.D. 1635 and 1855, possibly in 1769. The historic record of earthquakes in the Los Angeles basin begins in A.D. 1769 and contains no other earthquakes greater than M 6.7. Therefore, the San Joaquin Hills earthquake may be the largest historic earthquake in the Los Angeles basin.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Grant and P. M. Shearer Activity of the Offshore Newport-Inglewood Rose Canyon Fault Zone, Coastal Southern California, from Relocated Microseismicity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 747 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Precarious-Rock Constraints on Ground Motion from Historic and Recent Earthquakes in Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2002; 92(7): 2602 - 2611.