Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2002; v. 92; no. 1; p. 172-193; DOI: 10.1785/0120000832
© 2002 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (61)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hearn, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reilinger, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Dynamics of Izmit Earthquake Postseismic Deformation and Loading of the Düzce Earthquake Hypocenter

Elizabeth Harding Hearn, Roland Bürgmann and Robert E. Reilinger

Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
54-614, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
lizh{at}chandler.mit.edu
(E.H.H.)
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, California 94720
burgmann{at}seismo.berkeley.edu
(R.B.)
Earth Resources Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
reilinge{at}erl.mit.edu(R.E.R.)

Manuscript received 22 September 2000.

We have developed dynamic finite-element models of Izmit earthquake postseismic deformation to evaluate whether this deformation is better explained by afterslip (via either velocity-strengthening frictional slip or linear viscous creep) or by distributed linear viscoelastic relaxation of the lower crust. We find that velocity-strengthening frictional afterslip driven by coseismic shear stress loading can reproduce time-dependent Global Positioning System data better than either linear viscous creep on a vertical shear zone below the rupture or lower crustal viscoelastic relaxation. Our best frictional afterslip model fits the main features of postseismic slip inversions, in particular, high slip patches at (and below) the hypocenter and on the western Karadere segment, and limited afterslip west of the Hersek Delta (Bürgmann et al., 2002). The model requires a weakly velocity-strengthening fault, that is, either low effective normal stress in the slipping regions or a smaller value for the parameter describing rate-dependence of friction (a-b) than is indicated by laboratory experiments.

Our best afterslip model suggests that the Coulomb stress at the Düzce hypocenter increased by 0.14 MPa (1.4 bars) during the Izmit earthquake (assuming right-lateral slip on a surface dipping 50° to the north), and by another 0.1 MPa during the 87 days between the Izmit and Düzce earthquakes. In the Marmara Sea region (within about 160 km of the Izmit earthquake rupture), this model indicates that the Coulomb stresses increased by 15%-25% of the coseismic amount during the first 300 days after the earthquake. Three hundred days after the earthquake, postseismic contributions to Coulomb stressing rate on the Maramara region faults had fallen to values equal to or less than the inferred secular stress accumulation rate. Our estimates of postseismic Coulomb stress are highly model dependent: in the Marmara region, the linear viscous shear zone and viscoelastic lower crust models predict greater postseismic Coulomb stresses than the frictional afterslip model.

Near-field stress and fault-zone rheology estimates are sensitive to the Earth's elastic structure. When a layered elastic structure is incorporated in our model, it yields a Coulomb stress of 0.24 MPa at the Düzce hypocenter, significantly more than the 0.14 MPa estimated from the uniform elastic model. Because of the higher near-field coseismic stresses, the layered elastic model requires a higher value of velocity-strengthening parameter (A-B) ([a-b] times effective normal stress r') to produce comparable postseismic slip. (A-B) is estimated at 0.4 and 0.2 MPa, respectively, for the layered and uniform elastic models. These results highlight the importance of understanding the Earth's elastic structure and the mechanism for postseismic deformation if we wish to accurately model coseismic and postseismic crustal stresses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Johanson, E. J. Fielding, F. Rolandone, and R. Burgmann
Coseismic and Postseismic Slip of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake from Space-Geodetic Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S269 - S282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. M. Johnson, R. Burgmann, and K. Larson
Frictional Properties on the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California, Inferred from Models of Afterslip following the 2004 Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, September 1, 2006; 96(4B): S321 - S338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Hearn and R. Burgmann
The Effect of Elastic Layering on Inversions of GPS Data for Coseismic Slip and Resulting Stress Changes: Strike-Slip Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1637 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Static Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Layered Half-Space
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2003; 93(5): 2253 - 2263.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Interactions between the Landers and Hector Mine, California, Earthquakes from Space Geodesy, Boundary Element Modeling, and Time-Dependent Friction
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1450 - 1469.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Time-Dependent Distributed Afterslip on and Deep below the Izmit Earthquake Rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 126 - 137.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Estimating Slip Distribution for the Izmit Mainshock from Coseismic GPS, ERS-1, RADARSAT, and SPOT Measurements
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 138 - 160.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Duzce, Turkey, Earthquake, from GPS and InSAR Data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 161 - 171.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Postseismic Deformation near the Izmit Earthquake (17 August 1999, M 7.5) Rupture Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 194 - 207.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Space and Time Evolution of Rupture and Faulting during the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 256 - 266.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Seismological Society of America.