|
|
||||||||
Article |
zmit Mainshock from Coseismic GPS, ERS-1, RADARSAT, and SPOT Measurements
Department of Terrestrial and Planetary Dynamics (UMR 5562)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
14 ave. E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
Kurt.Feigl{at}cnes.fr
(K.L.F., A.R.)
Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
18 ave. E. Belin, 31401 Toulouse, France
Francesco, Sarti{at}cnes.fr
Helene.Vadon{at}cnes.fr
Philippe.Durand{at}cnes.fr
Didier.Massonet{at}cnes.fr
(F.S., H.V., P.D., D.M.)
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
E34, 42 Carleton Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142
simon{at}wegener.mit.edu, reilinge{at}erl.mit.edu
(S.M., R.R.)
TUBITAK, Marmara Research Center, ESRI,
Gebze 41470, Turkey
semih{at}yunus.mam.gov.tr
(S.E.)
Department of Earth and Planetary Science
307 McCone Hall, University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720
burgmann{at}seismo.berkeley.edu
(R.B.)
Manuscript received 15 September 2000.
We use four geodetic satellite systems (Global Positioning System [GPS], European Remote Sensing [ERS], RADARSAT, and Satellite Pour l'Observation de la Terre [SPOT]) to measure the permanent deformation field produced by the
zmit earthquake of 17 August 1999. We emphasize measurements from interferometric analysis of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images acquired by ERS and RADARSAT and their geodetic uncertainties. The primary seismological use of these data is to determine earthquake source parameters, such as the distribution of slip and the fault geometry. After accounting for one month's postseismic deformation, tropospheric delay, and orbital gradients, we use these data to estimate the distribution of slip at the time of the
zmit mainshock. The different data sets resolve different aspects of the distribution of slip at depth. Although these estimates agree to first order with those derived from surface faulting, teleseismic recordings, and strong motion, careful comparison reveals differences of 40% in seismic moment. We assume smooth parameterization for the fault geometry and a standard elastic dislocation model. The root mean square residual scatter is 25 mm and 11 mm for the ERS and RADARSAT range changes, respectively. Our estimate of the moment from a joint inversion of the four geodetic data sets is M0 = 1.84 x 1020 N m, a moment magnitude of Mw 7.50. These values are lower than other estimates using more realistic layered earth models. Given the differences between the various models, we conclude that the real errors in the estimated slip distributions are at the level of 1 m. The prudent geophysical conclusion is that coseismic slip during the
zmit earthquake tapers gradually from approximately 2 m under the Hersek delta to 1 m at a point 10 km west of it. We infer that the Yalova segment west of the Hersek delta may remain capable of significant slip in a future earthquake.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. G. Schiek and J. M. Hurtado Jr Slip analysis of the Kokoxili earthquake using terrain-change detection and regional earthquake data Geosphere, May 1, 2006; 2(3): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Muller, A. Aydin, and T. J. Wright Using an elastic dislocation model to investigate static Coulomb stress change scenarios for earthquake ruptures in the eastern Marmara Sea region, Turkey Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 253(1): 397 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Hearn and R. Burgmann The Effect of Elastic Layering on Inversions of GPS Data for Coseismic Slip and Resulting Stress Changes: Strike-Slip Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1637 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Mavroeidis and A. S. Papageorgiou A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1099 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Dynamics of Izmit Earthquake Postseismic Deformation and Loading of the Duzce Earthquake Hypocenter Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 172 - 193. |
||||
![]() |
Joint Inversion of InSAR, GPS, Teleseismic, and Strong-Motion Data for the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Earthquake Slip: Application to the 1999 Izmit Mainshock Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2002; 92(1): 278 - 299. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |