HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wesson, R. L. Articles by Perkins, D. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Spatial Correlation of Probabilistic Earthquake Ground Motion and Loss

U.S. Geological Survey
Central Region Geologic Hazards Team
P.O. Box 25046
Denver, Colorado 80225

Spatial correlation of annual earthquake ground motions and losses can be used to estimate the variance of annual losses to a portfolio of properties exposed to earthquakes. A direct method is described for the calculation of the spatial correlation of earthquake ground motions and losses. Calculations for the direct method can be carried out using either numerical quadrature or a discrete, matrix-based approach. Numerical results for this method are compared with those calculated from a simple Monte Carlo simulation. Spatial correlation of ground motion and loss is induced by the systematic attenuation of ground motion with distance from the source, by common site conditions, and by the finite length of fault ruptures. Spatial correlation is also strongly dependent on the partitioning of the variability, given an event, into interevent and intraevent components. Intraevent variability reduces the spatial correlation of losses. Interevent variability increases spatial correlation of losses. The higher the spatial correlation, the larger the variance in losses to a portfolio, and the more likely extreme values become. This result underscores the importance of accurately determining the relative magnitudes of intraevent and interevent variability in ground-motion studies, because of the strong impact in estimating earthquake losses to a portfolio. The direct method offers an alternative to simulation for calculating the variance of losses to a portfolio, which may reduce the amount of calculation required.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. Malhotra Seismic Design Loads from Site-Specific and Aggregate Hazard Analyses Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1849 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Goda and H. P. Hong Spatial Correlation of Peak Ground Motions and Response Spectra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 354 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Cao, M. D. Petersen, and A. D. Frankel Model Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2040 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]