Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2001; v. 91; no. 2; p. 263-275; DOI: 10.1785/0120000057
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

A Model of Tectonic Stress State and Rate Using the 1994 Northridge Earthquake Sequence

Susanna Gross

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences
University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado, 80309
sjg{at}quake.colorado.edu

A model of the spatial and temporal distribution of seismicity both before and after the Northridge, California, earthquake has been used to estimate the background stress state, loading rate, and some parameters relating to fault friction. A detailed source model was used to calculate the stress change field from the Northridge mainshock, which was fit to the spatial distribution of seismicity. Agreement between the best-fitting background stress state from seismicity modeling and the background stress state inferred from focal mechanisms was found to be 99% significant, showing that the spatial distribution of seismicity contains information about the stress state. The stress rate found for the Northridge area ({approx}1.2 Pa/day [0.004 bar/a]) is approximately a factor of 9 less than the stress rate expected from observed strain rates, which implies that aseismic deformation is reducing seismic hazard in the Los Angeles basin. The resulting estimate of the friction parameter AD {approx}0.008 is similar to laboratory values if an effective normal stress much smaller than the overburden and similar to background stress magnitudes {sigma} {approx} 70 MPa from the seismicity modeling is assumed to apply. Estimates of the magnitude of background stress, gradient of stress with depth and effective coefficient of friction are quite uncertain.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Seismological Society of America.