Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2001; v. 91; no. 1; p. 64-81; DOI: 10.1785/0119980160
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joswig, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Mapping Seismic Quiescence in California

Manfred Joswig*

GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam
Telegrafenberg
14473 Potsdam, Germany

The decrease of microearthquake activity is a controversial possible precursor for mainshock prediction. The calculation of seismic quiescence is a convenient tool to quantify this decrease. However, the actual size of an anomaly significantly depends on the calculation parameters. The necessary averaging over space and time acts as 3D lowpass filter, the sliding statistics windows introduce highpass behavior, and the magnitude threshold shall ensure catalog completeness but also biases the data selection. To argue on any claimed anomaly, the only conclusive solution would be an exhaustive search over all parameters, over an area significantly larger than just the epicenter region, and against a test of the null hypothesis.

QMAP is a new mapping approach to process full catalogs, that is, some twenty years of data for areas of one million km2, with one fixed set of parameters. It utilizes fractil statistics to avoid errors otherwise induced by clusters of aftershock series. QMAP features two different scaling modes, one to display absolute decrease and a second for weighted anomalies by erosion filtering. Applied to California, one can recognize quiescence anomalies of regional scale prior to the Coalinga and Loma Prieta earthquakes. But there are more and greater anomalies distributed all along the San Andreas fault system. Without further criteria to understand these patterns, the additional anomalies degrade seismic quiescence to an observation with high false alarm rate for earthquake prediction.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Seismological Society of America.