Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 2001; v. 91; no. 1; p. 112-127; DOI: 10.1785/0119990131
© 2001 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Earthquake Doublet in Kagoshima, Japan: Rupture of Asperities in a Stress Shadow

Haruo Horikawa

Geological Survey of Japan
Higashi 1-1-3
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8567, Japan
horikawa{at}gsj.go.jp

Two shallow moderate (M ~ 6) earthquakes occurred in the northwestern part of Kagoshima Prefecture, Kyushu, southern Japan. I discuss the effect of the stress change due to the first earthquake (26 March 1997) on the occurrence of the second earthquake (13 May 1997). The rupture characteristics of the two earthquakes are inferred in two steps to form the basis of the discussion. I first invert strong ground motion data to construct kinematic source models and then estimate the distribution of static stress drop from the derived dislocation distributions. The rupture process of the March event is simple and well described with rupture of a single asperity (patch of high stress drop). On the other hand, multiple asperities on conjugate faults ruptured during the May event. The maximum value of static stress drop for both earthquakes is about 4 MPa, and seems lower than those of other Japanese intraplate earthquakes. The hypocenter and the largest asperity of the May earthquake are located in a stress shadow caused by the March earthquake. Thus the rupture history of the May earthquake is difficult to explain with a static stress change model. Other mechanisms such as fluid migration and dynamic stresses were also investigated, but failed to explain the triggering. I propose the coupled effect of static change in shear stress and normal stress under the rate- and state-dependent friction law as a possible mechanism.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Parameters and Rupture Velocities of Microearthquakes in Western Nagano, Japan, Determined Using Stopping Phases
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1762 - 1780.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Characterization for Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation: Kinematic Heterogeneous Source Model and Strong Motion Generation Area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2531 - 2545.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Modeling Using Strong-Motion Waveforms: Toward Automated Determination of Earthquake Fault Planes and Moment-Release Distributions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 639 - 654.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Seismological Society of America.