Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2000; v. 90; no. 6B; p. S170-S186; DOI: 10.1785/0120000509
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Potential for Improving Ground-Motion Relations in Southern California by Incorporating Various Site Parameters

Yajie Lee* and John G. Anderson

Seismological Laboratory and Department of Geological Sciences
Mackay School of Mines
University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557

This article evaluates the possibility of improving a particular ground-motion relationship for predicting peak acceleration (PGA) and absolute response spectral accelerations at the periods of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 sec in southern California. We use the attenuation model of Abrahamson and Silva (1997), which Lee et al. (2000) found satisfactory for this region. We examine differences between observed and predicted values (residuals) as a function of several site attributes to determine whether corrections can be made to improve the predictions. This study differs from that of Steidl (2000) in that we use an attenuation model that accounts for sediment amplification and nonlinearity (Steidl used only a rock-site relationship). Residuals are significantly correlated with basin depth. Depending on the specific frequencies considered, ground motions at the deepest part of the basin average 30% to 80% higher than at the edge of the basin. Residuals are also significantly correlated with the estimates of the average amplification of peak velocity due to the basin velocity structure (Olsen, 2000). Since the basin depth is correlated with the average basin amplification, there is no need to correct the ground-motion model for both effects. Detailed geology is generally found unhelpful in improving ground-motion predictions. Overall, correcting the ground-motion relation reduces the standard error of ground-motion predictions by about 5%. Whether the ground-motion relation modifications suggested here are significant in terms of the implied seismic hazard is evaluated in Field and Petersen (2000).

The weak correlation of residuals with respect to site parameters motivated us to apply the test proposed by Lee et al. (1998). This involves plotting residuals versus residuals for stations that have recorded more than one earthquake. To the extent that systematic site effects cause the misfit between observations and the ground-motion model, such a plot will show correlation among the residuals. Correlation coefficients are, surprisingly, very low, ranging from 0.16 for PGA residuals to 0.26 for 3-sec response spectra. Thus it seems that it will be very difficult to refine ground-motion prediction equations beyond the very general categories now in use. Improved physical understanding of the site, source, and path contributions must play a major role in any future efforts to reduce the uncertainty in the ground-motion predictions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. P. Stewart, Y. Choi, R. W. Graves, and J. H. Shaw
Uncertainty of Southern California Basin Depth Parameters
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1988 - 1993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Halldorsson and A. S. Papageorgiou
Calibration of the Specific Barrier Model to Earthquakes of Different Tectonic Regions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1276 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Choi, J. P. Stewart, and R. W. Graves
Empirical Model for Basin Effects Accounts for Basin Depth and Source Location
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2005; 95(4): 1412 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. L. Bragato and D. Slejko
Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations for the Eastern Alps in the Magnitude Range 2.5-6.3
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2005; 95(1): 252 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 314 - 331.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Tectonically Active Regions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 332 - 352.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A New Method for Estimation of the Attenuation Relationship with Variance Components
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1984 - 1991.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field and the SCEC Phase III Working Group
Accounting for Site Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California: Overview of the SCEC Phase III Report
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S1 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S.-D. Ni, J. G. Anderson, Y. Zeng, and R. V. Siddharthan
Expected Signature of Nonlinearity on Regression for Strong Ground-Motion Parameters
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S53 - S64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Magistrale, S. Day, R. W. Clayton, and R. Graves
The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S65 - S76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. H. Steidl and Y. Lee
The SCEC Phase III Strong-Motion Database
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S113 - S135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. H. Steidl
Site Response in Southern California for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S149 - S169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field
A Modified Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationship for Southern California that Accounts for Detailed Site Classification and a Basin-Depth Effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S209 - S221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. H. Field and M. D. Petersen
A Test of Various Site-Effect Parameterizations in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses of Southern California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6B): S222 - S244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Seismological Society of America.