|
|
||||||||
Article |
Institute of Geophysics
ETH Hoenggerberg
CH-8093, Zurich, Switzerland
stefan{at}seismo.ifg.ethz.ch.
(S. W.)
Geophysical Institute
University of Alaska
Fairbanks, Alaska 99775
max{at}giseis.alaska.edu
(M. W.)
We mapped the minimum magnitude of complete reporting, Mc, for Alaska, the western United States, and for the JUNEC earthquake catalog of Japan. Mc was estimated based on its departure from the linear frequency-magnitude relation of the 250 closest earthquakes to grid nodes, spaced 10 km apart. In all catalogs studied, Mc was strongly heterogeneous. In offshore areas the Mc was typically one unit of magnitude higher than onshore. On land also, Mc can vary by one order of magnitude over distance less than 50 km. We recommend that seismicity studies that depend on complete sets of small earthquakes should be limited to areas with similar Mc, or the minimum magnitude for the analysis has to be raised to the highest common value of Mc. We believe that the data quality, as reflected by the Mc level, should be used to define the spatial extent of seismicity studies where Mc plays a role. The method we use calculates the goodness of fit between a power law fit to the data and the observed frequency-magnitude distribution as a function of a lower cutoff of the magnitude data. Mc is defined as the magnitude at which 90% of the data can be modeled by a power law fit. Mc in the 1990s is approximately 1.2 ± 0.4 in most parts of California, 1.8 ± 0.4 in most of Alaska (Aleutians and Panhandle excluded), and at a higher level in the JUNEC catalog for Japan. Various sources, such as explosions and earthquake families beneath volcanoes, can lead to distributions that cannot be fit well by power laws. For the Hokkaido region we demonstrate how neglecting the spatial variability of Mc can lead to erroneous assumptions about deviations from self-similarity of earthquake scaling.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Schorlemmer and J. Woessner Probability of Detecting an Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2008; 98(5): 2103 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Pechmann, W. J. Arabasz, K. L. Pankow, R. Burlacu, and M. K. McCarter Seismological Report on the 6 August 2007 Crandall Canyon Mine Collapse in Utah Seismological Research Letters, September 1, 2008; 79(5): 620 - 636. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Leonard One Hundred Years of Earthquake Recording in Australia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1458 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Amorese Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1742 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wiemer and D. Schorlemmer ALM: An Asperity-based Likelihood Model for California Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 134 - 140. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wyss and R. Stefansson Nucleation Points of Recent Mainshocks in Southern Iceland, Mapped by b-Values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2006; 96(2): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Woessner and S. Wiemer Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 684 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Ratchkovski, S. Wiemer, and R. A. Hansen Seismotectonics of the Central Denali Fault, Alaska, and the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake Sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S156 - S174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Husen, S. Wiemer, and R. B. Smith Remotely Triggered Seismicity in the Yellowstone National Park Region by the 2002 Mw 7.9 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S317 - S331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Pankow, W. J. Arabasz, J. C. Pechmann, and S. J. Nava Triggered Seismicity in Utah from the 3 November 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6B): S332 - S347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1207 - 1228. |
||||
![]() |
M. Wyss, C. G. Sammis, R. M. Nadeau, and S. Wiemer Fractal Dimension and b-Value on Creeping and Locked Patches of the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 410 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Dziak, D. R. Bohnenstiehl, H. Matsumoto, C. G. Fox, D. K. Smith, M. Tolstoy, T-K Lau, J. H. Haxel, and M. J. Fowler P- and T-Wave Detection Thresholds, Pn Velocity Estimate, and Detection of Lower Mantle and Core P-Waves on Ocean Sound-Channel Hydrophones at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 665 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Comment on "Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan," by Stefan Wiemer and Max Wyss Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1862 - 1867. |
||||
![]() |
Reply to "Comment on `Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan,' by Stefan Wiemer and Max Wyss," by Paul A. Rydelek and I. S. Sacks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1868 - 1871. |
||||
![]() |
Properties of the Aftershock Sequence of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake: Implications for Aftershock Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1227 - 1240. |
||||
![]() |
Most- and Least-Likely Locations of Large to Great Earthquakes along the Pacific Coast of Mexico Estimated from Local Recurrence Times Based on b-Values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1717 - 1728. |
||||
![]() |
Is Background Seismicity Produced at a Stationary Poissonian Rate? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2000; 90(5): 1174 - 1187. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |