Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2000; v. 90; no. 3; p. 790-796; DOI: 10.1785/0119990144
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasyanos, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

Predicting Geophysical Measurements: Testing a Combined Empirical and Model-Based Approach Using Surface Waves

Michael E. Pasyanos

Geophysics and Global Security Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P.O. Box 808, L-205
Livermore, CA 94551-0808
pasyanos1{at}llnl.gov

There are several approaches commonly used to provide spatial corrections of geophysical data. One end-member approach is to develop model-based corrections in which the variations are based either on a priori knowledge or on geophysical inversions, such as tomography. While this approach would have the advantage of full spatial coverage, in general one would be unable to recover the full station corrections due to the inherent averaging of models. Another end-member approach, common in seismically active regions, would be to develop empirically based corrections based directly on measurements. An example of this approach would be kriging or other interpolation techniques. The advantage of this approach is a true fit to the most applicable measurements, but at the cost of severe spatial limitations. Ideally, one would like to combine the two approaches. This short note demonstrates the value of a combined empirical and model-based approach to generating accurate spatial correction surfaces using surface wave measurements and a tomography model from the Middle East and North Africa. By kriging residual values from a tomographic model, there was a significant reduction in misfit over either approach alone. In principle, kriging measurement residuals from models could improve many geophysical applications from travel times to amplitudes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. D. Fisk and G. D. McCartor
Treatment of Correlation for Clustered Reference Data in Kriging Regional Seismic Discriminants
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1768 - 1780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. P. Flanagan, S. C. Myers, and K. D. Koper
Regional Travel-Time Uncertainty and Seismic Location Improvement Using a Three-Dimensional a priori Velocity Model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 804 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Regional Seismic-Event Characterization Using a Bayesian Formulation of Simple Kriging
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2277 - 2296.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Seismological Society of America.