HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, H.-P. Articles by Brown, L. T. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Comparison of Phase Velocities from Array Measurements of Rayleigh Waves Associated with Microtremor and Results Calculated from Borehole Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles

Hsi-Ping Liu, David M. Boore, William B. Joyner, David H. Oppenheimer, Richard E. Warrick, Wenbo Zhang^*, John C. Hamilton and Leo T. Brown

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
liu{at}usgs.gov
boore{at}usgs.gov
joyner{at}usgs.gov
oppen{at}usgs.gov
jhamilton{at}usgs.gov

Shear-wave velocities (V_S) are widely used for earthquake ground-motion site characterization. V_S data are now largely obtained using borehole methods. Drilling holes, however, is expensive. Nonintrusive surface methods are inexpensive for obtaining V_S information, but not many comparisons with direct borehole measurements have been published. Because different assumptions are used in data interpretation of each surface method and public safety is involved in site characterization for engineering structures, it is important to validate the surface methods by additional comparisons with borehole measurements. We compare results obtained from a particular surface method (array measurement of surface waves associated with microtremor) with results obtained from borehole methods. Using a 10-element nested-triangular array of 100-m aperture, we measured surface-wave phase velocities at two California sites, Garner Valley near Hemet and Hollister Municipal Airport. The Garner Valley site is located at an ancient lake bed where water-saturated sediment overlies decomposed granite on top of granite bedrock. Our array was deployed at a location where seismic velocities had been determined to a depth of 500 m by borehole methods. At Hollister, where the near-surface sediment consists of clay, sand, and gravel, we determined phase velocities using an array located close to a 60-m deep borehole where downhole velocity logs already exist. Because we want to assess the measurements uncomplicated by uncertainties introduced by the inversion process, we compare our phase-velocity results with the borehole V_S depth profile by calculating fundamental-mode Rayleigh-wave phase velocities from an earth model constructed from the borehole data. For wavelengths less than 2 times of the array aperture at Garner Valley, phase-velocity results from array measurements agree with the calculated Rayleigh-wave velocities to better than 11%. Measurement errors become larger for wavelengths 2 times greater than the array aperture. At Hollister, the measured phase velocity at 3.9 Hz (near the upper edge of the microtremor frequency band) is within 20% of the calculated Rayleigh-wave velocity. Because shear-wave velocity is the predominant factor controlling Rayleigh-wave phase velocities, the comparisons suggest that this nonintrusive method can provide V_S information adequate for ground-motion estimation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. S. Moss Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty of Thirty-Meter Shear-Wave Velocity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1399 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hartzell, S. Harmsen, R. A. Williams, D. Carver, A. Frankel, G. Choy, P.-C. Liu, R. C. Jachens, T. M. Brocher, and C. M. Wentworth Modeling and Validation of a 3D Velocity Structure for the Santa Clara Valley, California, for Seismic-Wave Simulations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2006; 96(5): 1851 - 1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Thelen, M. Clark, C. T. Lopez, C. Loughner, H. Park, J. B. Scott, S. B. Smith, B. Greschke, and J. N. Louie A Transect of 200 Shallow Shear-Velocity Profiles across the Los Angeles Basin Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2006; 96(3): 1055 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Stephenson, J. N. Louie, S. Pullammanappallil, R. A. Williams, and J. K. Odum Blind Shear-Wave Velocity Comparison of ReMi and MASW Results with Boreholes to 200 m in Santa Clara Valley: Implications for Earthquake Ground-Motion Assessment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2506 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Pezeshk and M. Zarrabi A New Inversion Procedure for Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves Using a Genetic Algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2005; 95(5): 1801 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Separation of Site Effects and Structural Focusing in Santa Monica, California: A Study of High-Frequency Weak Motions from Earthquakes and Blasts Recorded during the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3134 - 3151.

				A Comparison of ESAC and FK Methods of Estimating Phase Velocity Using Arbitrarily Shaped Microtremor Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2323 - 2332.

				Comparison of Site Response Characteristics Inferred from Microtremors and Earthquake Shear Waves Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1526 - 1536.

				Faster, Better: Shear-Wave Velocity to 100 Meters Depth from Refraction Microtremor Arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2001; 91(2): 347 - 364.