Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 2000; v. 90; no. 3; p. 587-603; DOI: 10.1785/0119990119
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moczo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Halada, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

3D Fourth-Order Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Schemes: Stability and Grid Dispersion

Peter Moczo, Jozef Kristek and Ladislav Halada

Geophysical Institute
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Dúbravská cesta 9
842 28 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
(P. M., J. K.)

Department of Mathematics
Engineering Faculty
Slovak Technical University
Nám. Slobody 17
812 31 Bratislava
Slovak Republic
(L. H.)

We investigated stability and grid dispersion in the 3D fourth-order in space, second-order in time, displacement-stress staggered-grid finite-difference scheme. Though only displacement-stress scheme is explicitly treated, all results also apply to the velocity-stress and displacement-velocity-stress finite-difference schemes.

We derived independent stability conditions for the P and S waves by exact separation of equations for the two types of waves.

Since the S-wave group velocity can differ from the actual velocity as much as 5% for the sampling ratio 1/5 (that is usually used in modeling), we recommend to sample a minimum S wavelength by six grid spacings.

Grid dispersion is strongest for a wave propagating in the direction of a coordinate axis and weakest for a wave propagating along a body diagonal.

Grid dispersion in the fourth-order scheme for the sampling ratios s = 1/5 and s = 1/6 is smaller than grid dispersion in the second-order scheme for s = 1/10 and s = 1/12, respectively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, and P. Liu
Simulated Ground Motion in Santa Clara Valley, California, and Vicinity from M>=6.7 Scenario Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1243 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. M. Corish, C. R. Bradley, and K. B. Olsen
Assessment of a Nonlinear Dynamic Rupture Inversion Technique Applied to a Synthetic Earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2007; 97(3): 901 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. A. Perez-Ruiz, F. Luzon, and A. Garcia-Jerez
Simulation of an Irregular Free Surface with a Displacement Finite-Difference Scheme
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2216 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
An Efficient Finite-Difference Method for Simulating 3D Seismic Response of Localized Basin Structures
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1690 - 1705.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Finite Volume Method for 2D Elastic Wave Propagation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2004; 94(4): 1500 - 1509.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Moczo, J. Kristek, and M. Galis
Simulation of the Planar Free Surface with Near-Surface Lateral Discontinuities in the Finite-Difference Modeling of Seismic Motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 760 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T.-S. Kang and C.-E. Baag
Finite-Difference Seismic Simulation Combining Discontinuous Grids with Locally Variable Timesteps
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 207 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
PML Absorbing Boundaries
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2003; 93(2): 891 - 903.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
3D Heterogeneous Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Modeling of Seismic Motion with Volume Harmonic and Arithmetic Averaging of Elastic Moduli and Densities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3042 - 3066.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
3D Site Effects: A Thorough Analysis of a High-Quality Dataset
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1941 - 1951.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Seismological Society of America.