Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 2000; v. 90; no. 2; p. 531-536; DOI: 10.1785/0119990134
© 2000 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichinose, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rodgers, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Short Note

Relative Importance of Near-, Intermediate- and Far-Field Displacement Terms in Layered Earth Synthetic Seismograms

Gene A. Ichinose*, Peter Goldstein and Arthur J. Rodgers

Geophysics and Global Security Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mail Code L-206
Livermore, California 94550

Manuscript received 30 September 1999.

Waveform modeling and moment tensor inversion commonly assume only the far-field response to the seismic source. However, for certain frequencies and distances the near- and intermediate-field terms of the Earth's response becomes important. We developed a criterion to estimate the relative importance of these terms for horizontally layered Earth models by comparing reflectivity synthetic seismograms, computed with just the far-field response (far-field terms only), with the complete response (all terms included). The frequency and range dependent differences of these two responses are quantified by measuring the difference between synthetics for regional and local earthquake scenarios, the 1992 Little Skull Mountain, Nevada (Mw 5.7) and 1997 Calico Hills, Nevada (Mw 4.0) earthquakes. For these crustal earthquakes, we found that the near-field term becomes important when the minimum frequency, fn (Hz) of the simulation at hypocentral distance r (km) is fn = {gamma}cr-1 where a reasonable crustal velocity for c is 5.8 km/sec and {gamma} is the fraction of a wavelength estimated in this study to be {approx} 0.6. The far-field response converges to the complete response for frequencies greater than fn.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. Rodgers, N. A. Petersson, S. Nilsson, B. Sjogreen, and K. McCandless
Broadband Waveform Modeling of Moderate Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area and Preliminary Assessment of the USGS 3D Seismic Velocity Model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 969 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Parameters of Eastern California and Western Nevada Earthquakes from Regional Moment Tensor Inversion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 61 - 84.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Seismological Society of America.