|
|
||||||||
Article |
Institute of Tectonics
University of California
Santa Cruz, California 95064
ward{at}uplift.ucsc.edu
Manuscript received 9 March 1999.
Earthquakes in California's San Francisco Bay Area are likely to be more strongly affected by stress interaction than earthquakes in any other place in the world because of the region's closely spaced, subparallel distribution of faults. I believe, therefore, that meaningful quantification of earthquake probability and hazard in the Bay Area can be made only with the guidance provided by physically based and regionwide earthquake models that account for this interaction. This article represents a first step in developing a standard physical earthquake model for the San Francisco Bay Area through realistic, 3000-year simulations of earthquakes on all of the area's major faults. These simulations demonstrate that a standard physical earthquake model is entirely feasible, they illustrate its application, and they blueprint its construction. A standard physical earthquake model provides the mechanism to integrate fully the diverse disciplines within the earthquake research community. As a platform for data utilization and verification, a physical earthquake model can employ directly any earthquake property that is measurable in the field or in the laboratory to tune and test its seismicity products. As a platform for probability forecasts, a physical earthquake model can supply rational estimates of every imaginable earthquake statistic while simultaneously satisfying all slip and earthquake rate constraints. As a platform for hazard analysis, a physical earthquake model can compute earthquake shaking intensity from first principles by convolving a full suite of rupture scenarios with site-specific dislocation Green's functions. Physical earthquake models have advanced greatly in the last decade. Simulations of earthquake generation and recurrence are now sufficiently credible that such calculations can begin to take substantial roles in scientific studies of earthquake probability and hazard.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lorito, A. Piatanesi, and A. Lomax Rupture Process of the 18 April 1906 California Earthquake from Near-Field Tsunami Waveform Inversion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 832 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Aagaard, T. M. Brocher, D. Dolenc, D. Dreger, R. W. Graves, S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, S. Larsen, K. McCandless, S. Nilsson, et al. Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part II: Ground-Motion Estimates for the 1906 Earthquake and Scenario Events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 1012 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Field Overview of the Working Group for the Development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 7 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Ward Methods for Evaluating Earthquake Potential and Likelihood in and around California Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 121 - 133. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yakovlev, D. L. Turcotte, J. B. Rundle, and P. B. Rundle Simulation-Based Distributions of Earthquake Recurrence Times on the San Andreas Fault System Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 1995 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Rundle, P. B. Rundle, A. Donnellan, D. L. Turcotte, R. Shcherbakov, P. Li, B. D. Malamud, L. B. Grant, G. C. Fox, D. McLeod, et al. A simulation-based approach to forecasting the next great San Francisco earthquake PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15363 - 15367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Finite-Source Modeling of the 1999 Taiwan (Chi-Chi) Earthquake Derived from a Dense Strong-Motion Network Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 91(5): 1144 - 1157. |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |