HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pettenati, F. Articles by Cavallini, F. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Objective treatment and synthesis of macroseismic intensity data sets using tessellation

National Group for Defence Against Earthquakes (GNDT) of the National Council for Research of Italy (CNR), OGS, Borgo Grotta Gigante, 42c, 34010 Sgonico, Trieste, Italy
Osservatorio Geofisico Sperimentale (OGS), Borgo Grotta Gigante, 42c, 34010 Sgonico, Trieste, Italy

Abstract

We propose to overcome the widespread practice of drawing isoseismal maps by tessellating the spatial distribution of observed intensity data with Voronoi polygons. It is shown that tracing isoseismals by hand or automatically, starting from irregularly spaced point observations, is an ill-posed problem, because (1) the regional intensity data set of an earthquake is the result of summing continuous components (such as radiation and attenuation) with discontinuous components (such as the effects of crustal and site geology); (2) the Nyquist principle also holds when tracing isoseismals, thus details (spatial high frequencies) can be observed only in areas with many observation points; (3) the combined process of sampling plus contouring in automatic procedures constitutes a two-dimensional filter. Thus, the idea that isoseismals somehow generate a total picture of earthquake effects in a region, which overcomes the paucity of available point observations, is misleading. The objective and quantitative treatment of the Voronoi intensity polygons renders automatic inversion of observed intensity data sets feasible. In the case of the Northridge, 17 January 1994, and Sierra Madre, 28 June 1991, earthquakes, our inversion of intensity is able to retrieve kinematic information on the sources that is in reasonable agreement with seismographic measurements. In Figure 3, however, it appears doubtful that our kinematic algorithm might be useful for improving regional seismic hazard calculations. However, our method seems promising for treating earthquakes of the preinstrumental era.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Pettenati and L. Sirovich Validation of the Intensity-Based Source Inversions of Three Destructive California Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1587 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. De Rubeis, P. Tosi, C. Gasparini, and A. Solipaca Application of Kriging Technique to Seismic Intensity Data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 540 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Validation of the Automatic Nonlinear Source Inversion of the U.S. Geological Survey Intensities of the Whittier Narrows 1987 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1737 - 1747.

				Tests of Source-Parameter Inversion of the U.S. Geological Survey Intensities of the Whittier Narrows 1987 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 47 - 60.

				Natural-Neighbor Isoseismals Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1933 - 1940.

				Test of Source-Parameter Inversion of the Intensities of a 54,000-Death Shock of the Seventeenth Century in Southeast Sicily Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 792 - 811.