Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1999; v. 89; no. 4; p. 1053-1076
© 1999 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangino, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ebel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The receiver structure beneath the China Digital Seismograph Network stations

S. Mangino*, K. Priestley and J. Ebel

Department of Earth Sciences Bullard Laboratories Cambridge University, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, United Kingdom
Weston Observatory Boston College, 381 Concord Road, Weston, Massachusetts 02193-1340

Abstract

Six new crustal models for the region beneath the China Digital Seismograph Network stations are obtained by inversion and forward modeling broadband teleseismic P-wave receiver functions. The seismic phases modeled are primarily P-to-S conversions and reverberations generated at the two highest impedance interfaces: the Moho and the sediment-basement contact; these are the best-constrained features of the crustal models. Receiver functions from all of the stations show some indication of laterally varying structure, but relatively simple 1D models can represent the crustal structure beneath the three stations in northeast China and the two stations on the margin of the Tibetan Plateau. The station on the northern flank of the Tien Shan mountains is on a complex upper crustal structure that we represent with a 2D crustal model. Crustal velocity models and Moho depths from the receiver function analysis are compared with other compilations of Chinese crustal structure. These closely agree for the more uniform crustal region in northeastern China, but the differences are greater in southern and western China, where the crustal structure is more complex.

Footnotes

* Present address: Center for Monitoring Research, 1300 N 17th Street, Suite 1450, Arlington Virginia 22209.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. H. Jacobsen and L. Svenningsen
Enhanced Uniqueness and Linearity of Receiver Function Inversion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1756 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
Earthquake focal depths, effective elastic thickness, and the strength of the continental lithosphere
Geology, June 1, 2000; 28(6): 495 - 498.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Seismological Society of America.